Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510725›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2022

A synthetic review of terrestrial biological research from the Alberta oil sands region: 10 years of published literature.

David R Roberts, Erin M Bayne, Danielle Beausoleil, Jacqueline Dennett, Jason T Fisher, Roderick O Hazewinkel, Diogo Sayanda, Faye Wyatt, Monique G Dubé

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrating traditional practices, livelihoods, and conservation with Indigenous-led furbearer camera trapping.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Using information theory to select spatial scales for species-habitat responses with camera traps.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. An integrated knowledge synthesis of regional ambient monitoring in Canada's oil sands.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David R RobertsAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-2422
Erin M BayneDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Danielle BeausoleilAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-2914
Jacqueline DennettDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jason T FisherSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Roderick O HazewinkelAlberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Diogo SayandaAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Faye WyattUK Met Office, Exeter, UK.
Monique G DubéCumulative Effects Environmental Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alberta Environment and Protected Areas · CAUniversity of Alberta · CACumulative Environmental Management Association · CAMet Office · GBUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

Oil Sands Monitoring Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, a large volume of peer-reviewed papers has examined the potential impacts of oil and gas resource extraction in the Canadian oil sands (OS). A large proportion focuses on terrestrial biology: wildlife, birds, and vegetation. We provide a qualitative synthesis of the condition of the environment in the oil sands region (OSR) from 2009 to 2020 to identify gaps and progress cumulative effects assessments. Our objectives were to (1) qualitatively synthesize and critically review knowledge from the OSR; (2) identify consistent trends and generalizable conclusions; and (3) pinpoint gaps in need of greater monitoring or research effort. We visualize knowledge and terrestrial monitoring foci by allocating papers to a conceptual model for the OS. Despite a recent increase in publications, focus has remained concentrated on a few key stressors, especially landscape disturbance, and a few taxa of interest. Stressor and response monitoring is well represented, but direct monitoring of pathways (linkages between stressors and responses) is limited. Important knowledge gaps include understanding effects at multiple spatial scales, mammal health effects monitoring, focused monitoring of local resources important to Indigenous communities, and geospatial coverage and availability, including higher attribute resolution in human footprint, comprehensive land cover mapping, and up-to-date LiDAR coverage. Causal attribution based on spatial proximity to operations or spatial orientation of monitoring in the region is common but may be limited in the strength of inference that it provides. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:388-406. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringOil and Gas FieldsAlbertaAnimalsBirdsEcotoxicologyAthabascaBiodiversityCanadaCumulative effectsEnvironmental monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34510725
PMCPMC9292629
OpenAlexW3199347971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.