Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510714›Full record

Trial reportMolecular oncology2021

Blood-based detection of lung cancer using cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61) as a circulating protein biomarker: a pilot study.

Lucija Ačkar, Swaantje Casjens, Antje Andreas, Irina Raiko, Thomas Brüning, Maria Geffken, Sven Peine, Jens Kollmeier, Georg Johnen, Kai Bartkowiak and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. CCN proteins: opportunities for clinical studies-a personal perspective.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucija AčkarDepartment of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8703-2096
Swaantje CasjensInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Germany.
Antje AndreasDepartment of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Irina RaikoInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Germany.
Thomas BrüningInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Germany.
Maria GeffkenDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Sven PeineDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jens KollmeierLungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany.
Georg JohnenInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Germany.
Kai BartkowiakDepartment of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Daniel Gilbert WeberInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Germany.
Klaus PantelDepartment of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine · DEHelios Klinikum Emil von Behring · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most often diagnosed cancer and the main cause of cancer deaths in the world compared with other tumor entities. To date, the only screening method for high-risk lung cancer patients is low-dosed computed tomography which still suffers from high false-positive rates and overdiagnosis. Therefore, there is an obvious need to identify biomarkers for the detection of lung cancer that could be used to guide the use of low-dosed computed tomography or other imaging procedures. We aimed to assess the performance of the protein cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61) as a circulating biomarker for the detection of lung cancer. CYR61 concentrations in plasma were significantly elevated in 87 lung cancer patients (13.7 ± 18.6 ng·mL

Indexed as

CysteineLung NeoplasmsBiomarkersCysteine-Rich Protein 61FemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsBiomarkersCCN1 protein, humanCysteineCysteine-Rich Protein 61biomarkercancerCYR61liquid biopsylung cancerplasma

Identifiers

PMID34510714
PMCPMC8564649
OpenAlexW3200404732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.