Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510706›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2022

Integration of clinical perspective into biomimetic bioreactor design for orthopedics.

Victoria Drapal, Jordan M Gamble, Jennifer L Robinson, Candan Tamerler, Paul M Arnold, Elizabeth A Friis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Integration of clinical perspective into biomimetic bioreactor design for orthopedics.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria DrapalBioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Jordan M GambleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Jennifer L RobinsonBioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Candan TamerlerBioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Paul M ArnoldCarle School of Medicine, University of Illinois-Champaign Urbana, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Elizabeth A FriisBioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenges to accommodate multiple tissue formation metrics in conventional bioreactors have resulted in an increased interest to explore novel bioreactor designs. Bioreactors allow researchers to isolate variables in controlled environments to quantify cell response. While current bioreactor designs can effectively provide either mechanical, electrical, or chemical stimuli to the controlled environment, these systems lack the ability to combine all these stimuli simultaneously to better recapitulate the physiological environment. Introducing a dynamic and systematic combination of biomimetic stimuli bioreactor systems could tremendously enhance its clinical relevance in research. Thus, cues from different tissue responses should be studied collectively and included in the design of a biomimetic bioreactor platform. This review begins by providing a summary on the progression of bioreactors from simple to complex designs, focusing on the major advances in bioreactor technology and the approaches employed to better simulate in vivo conditions. The current state of bioreactors in terms of their clinical relevance is also analyzed. Finally, this review provides a comprehensive overview of individual biophysical stimuli and their role in establishing a biomimetic microenvironment for tissue engineering. To date, the most advanced bioreactor designs only incorporate one or two stimuli. Thus, the cell response measured is likely unrelated to the actual clinical performance. Integrating clinically relevant stimuli in bioreactor designs to study cell response can further advance the understanding of physical phenomenon naturally occurring in the body. In the future, the clinically informed biomimetic bioreactor could yield more efficiently translatable results for improved patient care.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsBiomimeticsBioreactorsHumansTissue Engineeringbiomimeticbioreactorbonecartilageclinical relevancymultiple stimuliorthopedics

Identifiers

PMID34510706
PMCPMC9292211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.