Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510654›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Longitudinal Assessment of Prognostic Understanding in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer and Its Association with Their Psychological Distress.

Daisuke Arai, Takashi Sato, Ichiro Nakachi, Daisuke Fujisawa, Mari Takeuchi, Yasunori Sato, Ichiro Kawada, Hiroyuki Yasuda, Shinnosuke Ikemura, Hideki Terai and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Survivorship Challenges and Supportive Care in Lung Cancer.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Daisuke AraiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi SatoDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2338-1665
Ichiro NakachiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-9318
Daisuke FujisawaDivision of Patient Safety, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mari TakeuchiPalliative Care Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasunori SatoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-5126
Ichiro KawadaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki YasudaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinnosuke IkemuraDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki TeraiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigenari NukagaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi InoueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sano-Kosei General Hospital, Sano, Japan.
Morio NakamuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitaka OyamadaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi TerashimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan.
Koichi SayamaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Fumitake SaitoDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Eiju General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumio SakamakiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Japan.
Katsuhiko NaokiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Koichi FukunagaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenzo SoejimaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prognostic understanding in patients with advanced cancer is essential for shared decision making; however, patients may experience psychological burden through knowing the incurable nature of advanced cancer. It has been unclear how their prognostic understanding fluctuates and whether accurate prognostic understanding is associated with psychological distress from the time of diagnosis over time. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe longitudinally investigated prognostic understanding in 225 patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer at 16 hospitals in Japan until 24 months after diagnosis. We examined associated factors with being consistently accurate in prognostic understanding, especially focusing on its association with psychological well-being.

resultsThe proportion of patients with an inaccurate prognostic understanding remained approximately 20% over time with the presence of patients with inconsistent understanding. Patients with consistently accurate prognostic understanding showed a significantly lower Emotional Well-Being subscale score at both 3 and 6 months after diagnosis (p = .010 and p = .014, respectively). In multivariate analyses, being consistently accurate in prognostic understanding was significantly associated with female gender and higher lung cancer-specific symptom burden at 3 months (p = .008 and p = .005, respectively) and lower emotional well-being at 6 months (p = .006).

conclusionAlthough substantial proportions of patients with advanced lung cancer had inaccurate prognostic understanding from the time of diagnosis over time, patients with consistently accurate prognostic understanding experienced greater psychological burden. Our findings highlight the importance of continuous psychological care and support for patients who understand their severe prognosis accurately. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study demonstrated that approximately 20% of patients with advanced lung cancer had an inaccurate understanding about their prognosis, not only at the time of diagnosis but also at the later time points. Being consistently accurate in prognostic understanding was significantly associated with elevated levels of psychological distress. Although accurate prognostic understanding is essential for decision making for treatment and advance care planning, health care providers should be aware of psychological burdens in patients that accept their severe prognosis accurately. Appropriate care and support for such patients are warranted from diagnosis over time.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPsychological DistressFemaleHumansJapanPrognosisAdvanced lung cancerPrognostic understandingPsychological distressQuality of lifeWell-being

Identifiers

PMID34510654
PMCPMC8649026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.