Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510405›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2021

Discussion on "Causal mediation of semicompeting risks" by Yen-Tsung Huang.

Isabel R Fulcher, Ilya Shpitser, Vanessa Didelez, Kali Zhou, Daniel O Scharfstein

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel R FulcherDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1209-824X
Ilya ShpitserDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-7326
Vanessa DidelezLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany and Departments of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-7706
Kali ZhouDivision of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8554-2906
Daniel O ScharfsteinDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-9653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Huang proposes a method for assessing the impact of a point treatment on mortality either directly or mediated by occurrence of a nonterminal health event, based on data from a prospective cohort study in which the occurrence of the nonterminal health event may be preemptied by death but not vice versa. The author uses a causal mediation framework to formally define causal quantities known as natural (in)direct effects. The novelty consists of adapting these concepts to a continuous-time modeling framework based on counting processes. In an effort to posit "scientifically interpretable estimands," statistical and causal assumptions are introduced for identification. In this commentary, we argue that these assumptions are not only difficult to interpret and justify, but are also likely violated in the hepatitis B motivating example and other survival/time to event settings as well.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCausalityHumansProspective Studiescausal inferencemediationsemicompeting riskssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID34510405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.