Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510380›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Short-term outcomes of robotic distal gastrectomy with the "preemptive retropancreatic approach": a propensity score matching analysis.

Yuma Ebihara, Yo Kurashima, Soichi Murakami, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Satoshi Hirano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of the learning curve of robotZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuma EbiharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan. yuma-ebi@wc4.so-net.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-8067
Yo KurashimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan.
Soichi MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan.
Toshiaki ShichinoheDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the usefulness of the preemptive retropancreatic approach (PRA) in robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) using multi-jointed forceps. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of RDG with PRA and conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the propensity score matching method. A total of 126 patients [RDG = 55; laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) = 71] were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were matched using the following propensity score covariates: age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, the extent of lymph node dissection, and Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma stage. Surgical results and postoperative outcomes were compared. We identified 28 propensity score-matched pairs. The median operative time and blood loss were comparable (P = 0.272 and P = 0.933, respectively). Regarding postoperative outcomes, the incidence of postoperative complications [Clavien-Dindo classification II (CD ≥ II)] was lower in the RDG group than in the LDG group (P = 0.020). No significant differences in the peak C-reactive protein value and length of hospital stay were observed between the two groups (P = 0.391 and P = 0.057, respectively). In addition, no patients had postoperative pancreas-related complications (≥ CD II) in the RDG group. RDG using PRA seems to be a safe and feasible procedure for gastric cancer because of short-term outcomes and reduction of postoperative complications (especially postoperative pancreas-related complications) as compared to conventional LDG.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGastric cancerLaparoscopic distal gastrectomyPostoperative complicationsPreemptive retropancreatic approach

Identifiers

PMID34510380
OpenAlexW3199708202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.