Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510329›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2021

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuro-oncology outcomes.

Sofya Norman, Alexander Ramos, Alexandra M Giantini Larsen, Evan Bander, Jacob Goldberg, Whitney Parker, Rupa G Juthani

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted clinical care and research in Neuro-Oncology?Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sofya NormanWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Alexander RamosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra M Giantini LarsenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Evan BanderDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jacob GoldbergDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Whitney ParkerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Rupa G JuthaniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. rgj9002@med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-3676
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has uprooted healthcare systems worldwide, disrupting care and increasing dependence on alternative forms of health care delivery. It is yet to be determined how the pandemic affected neuro-oncology patient outcomes, given that the majority of even "elective" neurosurgical oncology procedures are time-sensitive. This study quantifies changes in neuro-oncological care during the height of the pandemic and investigates patient outcomes in 2020 compared to a historical control.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients with malignant brain tumor diagnoses who were seen at our institution between March 13 and May 1 of 2020 and 2019. Alterations in care, including shift from in-person to telehealth, delays in evaluation and intervention, and treatment modifications were evaluated. These variables were analyzed with respect to brain tumor control and mortality.

results112 patients from 2020 to 166 patients from 2019 were included. There was no significant difference in outcomes between the cohorts, despite significantly more treatment delays (p = 0.0160) and use of telehealth (p < 0.0001) in 2020. Patients in 2020 who utilized telehealth visits had significantly more stable tumor control than those who had office visits (p = 0.0124), consistent with appropriate use of in-person visits for patients with progression.

conclusionsOur study showed that use of telehealth and selective alterations in neuro-oncological care during the COVID-19 pandemic did not lead to adverse patient outcomes. This suggests that adaptive physician-led changes were successful and may inform management during the ongoing pandemic, especially with the emergence of the Delta variant.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineCOVID-19 pandemicNeuro-oncologyOutcomesTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34510329
PMCPMC8435177
OpenAlexW3200364785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.