ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2021
Usefulness of the mayo adhesive probability score as a predictive factor for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Male Gender Is a Contributing Risk Factor to Predict Sticky Fat in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting post-surgical complications using renal scoring systems.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Impact of Mayo Adhesive Probability score and BMI on renal functional decline after robotic assisted partial nephrectomy.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Review
- The Mayo Adhesive Probability Score as a Predictor of Postoperative Renal Function in Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhether the Mayo adhesive probability score, an index of the perinephric fat environment, could be a predictive factor for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy was investigated.
methodsA retrospective case-control study of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed. An estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation rate at ≤ 90% at 3 months after surgery was defined as postoperative renal function deterioration. These patients were divided into two groups (non-deterioration and deterioration groups). Patient factors including Mayo adhesive probability scores (both tumor and unaffected sides) and surgical factors were evaluated to identify the predictors for postoperative renal function deterioration. The statistical analysis used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
resultsThirty-seven (47.4%) patients had postoperative renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy. Univariate analysis identified Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side (p = 0.02), and warm ischemia time (p < 0.01) as predictors of postoperative renal function deterioration. On multivariate analyses, Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side (odds ratio: 1.38 [1.05-1.79], p = 0.02) and warm ischemia time (odds ratio: 1.04 [1.01-1.07], p < 0.01) were significantly associated with postoperative renal function deterioration as same as univariate analysis. On receive operating characteristic curve analysis, Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side (cutoff value 1.5; p = 0.02) and warm ischemia time (cutoff value 26.5 min; p = 0.01) were significant predictors of renal function deterioration 3 month after surgery.
conclusionThe Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side and warm ischemia time are useful predictors for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2019-249, January 21st, 2019, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34510283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.