Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510258›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Outcome for sinonasal malignancies: a population-based survey.

Anna Hafström, Johanna Sjövall, Simon S Persson, Johan S Nilsson, Christer Svensson, Eva Brun, Lennart Greiff

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Real-Life Prognosis of Sinonasal Tumors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna HafströmDepartment of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. anna.hafstrom@skane.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-0347
Johanna SjövallDepartment of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6540-7168
Simon S PerssonDepartment of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Johan S NilssonDepartment of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Christer SvenssonDepartment of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Eva BrunDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-7430
Lennart GreiffDepartment of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7004-1989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSinonasal malignancies (SNM) represent a rare and complex group of cancers that includes a wide range of histopathological subtypes. Data from population-based cohorts are scarce but warranted as a basis for randomized controlled treatment trials (RCTs). Our aim was to assess overall and histology subset-specific outcomes for SNM patients treated at a tertiary referral centre.

methodsA retrospective, population-based, consecutive cohort of patients with SNMs diagnosed from 2001 through 2019 was examined. Outcome was analysed in relation to age, gender, site, stage, histopathology, and treatment.

resultsTwo-hundred and twenty-six patients were identified, whereof 61% presented with stage IV disease. 80% completed treatment with curative intent, which comprised surgery with neoadjuvant (29%) or adjuvant (37%) radiotherapy, monotherapy with surgery (22%), definitive chemoradiotherapy (7%), or radiotherapy (5%). Median follow-up was 106 months. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 57% and 35%, respectively. Median overall survival was 76 months (esthesioneuroblastoma: 147 months; adenocarcinoma: 117; salivary carcinoma: 88; mucosal melanoma: 69; squamous cell carcinoma: 51, undifferentiated carcinoma: 42; neuroendocrine carcinoma: 9; and NUT-carcinoma 5). The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 63% and 54%, respectively, and disease-specific survival 83% and 66%. Increasing age, stage IVB, melanoma histopathology, and treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy emerged as significant independent prognostic risk factors for disease-specific mortality (p ≤ 0.001).

conclusionThe results indicate a seemingly good outcome in comparison to previous reports, particularly for mucosal melanoma, adenocarcinoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma. The study provides additional background for future RCTs focusing on histology subset-specific treatment for SNM.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellMelanomaNose NeoplasmsParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsHumansNasal CavityRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdenocarcinomaHead and neck cancerHead and neck surgeryMucosal melanomaMultimodal cancer therapySinonasal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34510258
PMCPMC8986678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.