Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510244›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

The role of E-Cadherin expression in primary site of breast cancer.

Nora Karsten, Thomas Kolben, Sven Mahner, Susanne Beyer, Sarah Meister, Christina Kuhn, Elisa Schmoeckel, Rachel Wuerstlein, Nadia Harbeck, Nina Ditsch and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High glucose enhances NScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  2. E-cadherin expression promotes tumor growth via KLRG1-dependent pathways.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nora Karsten *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Thomas Kolben *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Susanne BeyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sarah MeisterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christina KuhnDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Elisa SchmoeckelDepartment of Pathology, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 27, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Rachel WuerstleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Nina DitschDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Udo JeschkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. udo.jeschke@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-3235
Klaus FrieseDepartment of Oncology, Hospital Bad Trissl, Bad-Trissl-Straße 73, 83080, Oberaudorf, Germany.
Theresa Maria KolbenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe tumour's ability to metastasize is the major cause for fatal outcomes in cancer diseases. In breast cancer, aberrant E-Cadherin expression has been linked to invasiveness and poor prognosis.

methodWe assessed expression of E-Cadherin by immunohistochemistry in primary tumour tissue from 125 female breast cancer patients. Staining intensities were analysed using the immunoreactive score (IRS). We investigated E-Cadherin expression and its associations with clinicopathological parameters (age, tumour size, lymph node status, grade, hormone receptors, Her2 Status) as well as with recurrence and survival.

resultsIncreased, rather than aberrant E-Cadherin expression was found and was associated with poor outcome (p = 0.046). Our data show an association between elevated E-Cadherin in primary tumour tissue and an unfavourable negative prognosis in patients.

conclusionThis association was somehow unexpected as loss of E-Cadherin has long been regarded as a prerequisite for development of invasiveness and metastases. Our findings support the notion that E-Cadherin promotes, rather than suppresses, development of metastasis and invasiveness.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCadherinsAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCDH1 protein, humanBreast cancerE-cadherinMetastasisPrognosisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID34510244
PMCPMC8967771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.