Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510228›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2021

Dynamically monitoring cellular γ-H2AX reveals the potential of carcinogenicity evaluation for genotoxic compounds.

Minmin Qu, Hua Xu, Wuju Li, Jia Chen, Yajiao Zhang, Bin Xu, Zhi Li, Tao Liu, Lei Guo, Jianwei Xie

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Minmin QuState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Hua XuState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China. huarxu@163.com.
Wuju LiBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Jia ChenState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Yajiao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Bin XuState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Zhi LiState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Tao LiuBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Lei GuoState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China.
Jianwei XieState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100850, China. xiejw@bmi.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-2644
Academy of Military Medical Sciences · CNBeijing Institute of Education · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 21974151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amongst all toxicological endpoints, carcinogenicity might pose the greatest concern. Genetic damage has been considered an important underlying mechanism for the carcinogenicity of chemical substances. The demand for in vitro genotoxic tests as alternative approaches is growing rapidly with the implementation of new regulations for compounds. However, currently available in vitro genotoxicity tests are often limited by relatively high false positive rates. Moreover, few studies have explored carcinogenicity potential by in vitro genotoxicity testing due to the shortage of suitable toxicological biomarkers to link gene damage with cancer risk. γ-H2AX is a recently acknowledged attractive endpoint (biomarker) for evaluating DNA damage and can simultaneously reflect the DNA damage response and repair of cells. We previously reported an ultrasensitive and reliable method, namely stable-isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS), for detecting cellular γ-H2AX and evaluating genotoxic chemicals. More importantly, our method can dynamically monitor the specific processes of genotoxic compounds affecting DNA damage and repair reflected by the amount of γ-H2AX. To clarify the possibility of using this method to assess the potential carcinogenicity of genotoxic chemicals, we applied it to a set of 69 model compounds recommended by the European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), with already-characterized genotoxic potential. Compared to conventional in vitro genotoxicity assays, including the Ames test, the γ-H2AX assay by MS has high accuracy (94-96%) due to high sensitivity and specificity (88% and 100%, respectively). The dynamic profiles of model compounds after exposure in HepG2 cells were explored, and a mathematical approach was employed to simulate and quantitatively model the DNA repair kinetics of genotoxic carcinogens (GCs) based on γ-H2AX time-effect curves up to 8 h. Two crucial parameters, i.e., k (rate of γ-H2AX decay) and t

Indexed as

BiomarkersCarcinogenicity TestsChromatography, LiquidHep G2 CellsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHistonesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMutagenicity TestsSensitivity and SpecificityTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersH2AX protein, humanHistonesCarcinogenicityGenotoxic carcinogensGenotoxicityMass spectrometryγ-H2AX

Identifiers

PMID34510228
OpenAlexW3199695627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.