Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34509550›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022

Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model.

Tien T Tang, Janice A Zawaski, Shelli Kesler, Christine A Beamish, Taeko Inoue, Emma C Perez, Lawrence Bronk, Falk Poenisch, Tina M Briere, Omaima M Sabek and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tien T TangDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology Section, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Janice A ZawaskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology Section, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Shelli KeslerSchool of Nursing and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell School of Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Christine A BeamishDepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.
Taeko InoueDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology Section, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Emma C PerezDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology Section, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Lawrence BronkDepartments of Radiation and Experimental Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Falk PoenischDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Tina M BriereDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Omaima M SabekDepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.
David R GrosshansDepartments of Radiation and Experimental Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
M Waleed GaberDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology Section, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: gaber@bcm.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USHouston Methodist · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

(PQ 9) Synaptic basis of deficits in attention and executive function following cranial radiationR01CA208535 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GROSSHANS, DAVID R · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
Characterization of the cellular mechanisms of radiation induced brain necrosis for clinical interventionR01CA255596 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GROSSHANS, DAVID R · 2021 to 2025
$871k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208535NCI NIH HHS R01 CA255596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCompared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging markers and molecular differences between the radiation modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Juvenile rats received a single faction of 10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness-weighted dose) delivered with 6 MV X-CRT or at the midspread out Bragg peak of a 100 MeV P-CRT beam. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT, executive function was measured using 5-choice serial reaction time task. At ∼12 months post-CRT, animals were imaged with

resultsIrradiated animals had cognitive impairment with a higher number of omissions and lower incorrect and premature responses compared with sham (P ≤ .05). The accuracy of the animals' X-CRT was less than that of sham (P ≤ .001). No significant difference in rates of cognitive change were found between the radiation modalities. At 12 months post-CRT, glucose metabolism was significantly higher than sham in X-CRT (P = .04) but not P-CRT. Using diffusion tensor imaging, P-CRT brains were found to have higher white matter volume and fiber lengths compared with sham (P < .03). Only X-CRT animals had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values compared with sham (P = .04). P-CRT animals had more connectomic changes compared with X-CRT. Correlative analysis identified several imaging features with cognitive performance. Furthermore, microgliosis (P < .05), astrogliosis (P < .01), and myelin thinning (P <.05) were observed in both radiation modalities, with X-CRT showing slightly more inflammation.

conclusionsBoth P-CRT and X-CRT lead to neurocognitive changes compared with sham. Although no significant difference was observed in neuroinflammation between the irradiated groups, differences were found in late-term glucose metabolism and brain connectome. Our results indicate that despite relative biological effectiveness weighting of the proton dose there are still differential effects which warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingProtonsAnimalsBrainCognitionCranial IrradiationRatsProtons

Identifiers

PMID34509550
PMCPMC8748279
OpenAlexW3201255986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.