Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34509180›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2022

Food environment interactions after migration: a scoping review on low- and middle-income country immigrants in high-income countries.

Aravinda Berggreen-Clausen, Sai Hseing Pha, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Agneta Andersson, Meena Daivadanam

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Bridging Voices Through Food: Sub-Saharan African Young People's Perspectives of Food and Nutrition Policy in Victoria, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aravinda Berggreen-ClausenDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 560, Uppsala75122, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-3960
Sai Hseing PhaDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7081-4347
Helle Mölsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Agneta AnderssonDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 560, Uppsala75122, Sweden.
Meena DaivadanamDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 560, Uppsala75122, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9532-6059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo map and characterise the interactions between the food environment and immigrant populations from low- and middle-income countries living in high-income countries.

designA scoping review was carried out following the framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley, as well as Levac et al. Peer-reviewed studies in English published between 2007 and 2021 were included. Two reviewers screened and selected the papers according to predefined inclusion criteria and reporting of results follows the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A ‘Best fit’ framework synthesis was carried out using the Analysis Grid for Environments Linked to Obesity (ANGELO) framework.

settingHigh-income countries.

participantsImmigrants from low- and middle-income countries.

resultsA total of sixty-eight articles were included, primarily based in the USA, as well as Canada, Australia and Europe, with immigrants originating from five regions of the globe. The analysis identified three overarching themes that interconnected different aspects of the food environment in addition to the four themes of the ANGELO framework. They demonstrate that in valuing fresh, healthy and traditional foods, immigrants were compelled to surpass barriers in order to acquire these, though children’s demands, low incomes, time scarcity and mobility influenced the healthiness of the foods acquired.

conclusionThis study brought together evidence on interactions between immigrant populations and the food environment. Immigrants attempted to access fresh, traditional, healthier food, though they faced structural and family-level barriers that impacted the healthiness of the food they acquired. Understanding the food environment and interactions therein is key to proposing interventions and policies that can potentially impact the most vulnerable.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsChildDeveloped CountriesHumansIncomePovertyANGELO frameworkFood accessFood choiceFood environmentImmigrantsMigrationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID34509180
PMCPMC8825972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.