Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34509177›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2022

What is known about human milk bank donors around the world: a systematic scoping review.

Bruna Gutierrez Dos Santos, Maryanne T Perrin

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruna Gutierrez Dos SantosNutrition Department, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 319 College Avenue, 318 Stone Building, Greensboro, NC27412, USA.
Maryanne T PerrinNutrition Department, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 319 College Avenue, 318 Stone Building, Greensboro, NC27412, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-8310
University of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe WHO recommends that low birth weight infants receive donor human milk (DHM) when mother's milk is not available. Systematic reviews have been published regarding clinical outcomes of infants receiving DHM, as well as the impact of pasteurisation on the composition of DHM; however, information about milk bank donors has not been systematically assessed.

designWe conducted a systematic scoping review of original research articles about milk bank donors published before August 2020.

settingGlobally.

participantsDonors to milk banks.

resultsA total of twenty-eight studies were included across a variety of geographies: the USA (n 8), Brazil (n 7), Spain (n 4), India (n 2), and single studies in France, Norway, Poland, Italy, Taiwan, Korea and China. Study variables were grouped into six main categories: Donor Demographics (n 19), Clinical Characteristics (n 20), Donor Experiences (n 16), Donation Patterns (n 16), Lifestyle Characteristics (n 4) and Lactation/Breast-feeding History (n 8). Some demographic characteristics were commonly reported across regions, while other, including gender and race, were infrequently explored. Factors that might influence the composition of DHM, including birth timing (term or pre-term), milk type (colostrum, transition or mature) and maternal diet were not regularly studied. Other gaps in the literature included (1) donors' motivations and barriers to donation, (2) lactation and breast-feeding history, including factors that influence donors to pump and amass surplus milk, and (3) donation patterns, including whether donors are also selling milk to corporations or sharing milk with peers.

conclusionWhat is known about milk bank donors in different geographies is often limited to a single study, with heterogeneity in the variables reported.

Indexed as

Milk BanksBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfantLactationMilk, HumanPeer GroupDonor milkDonorsHuman milkMilk banking

Identifiers

PMID34509177
PMCPMC8883786
OpenAlexW3199588761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.