Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34508994›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2021

Efficacy and safety of BNT162b2 vaccination in patients with solid cancer receiving anticancer therapy - a single centre prospective study.

Einat S Shmueli, Amit Itay, Ofer Margalit, Raanan Berger, Sharon Halperin, Menucha Jurkowicz, Einav G Levin, Itzchak Levy, Liraz Olmer, Gili Regev-Yochay and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Interplay of Lung Cancer, COVID-19, and Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Einat S ShmueliDepartment of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel. Electronic address: Einat.shmueli@sheba.health.gov.il.
Amit ItayDepartment of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel.
Ofer MargalitDepartment of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel.
Raanan BergerDepartment of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel.
Sharon HalperinDepartment of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Menucha JurkowiczDepartment of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Einav G LevinSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel; The Infectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Itzchak LevySackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel; The Infectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Liraz OlmerBio-statistical and Bio-mathematical Unit, The Gertner Institute of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Gili Regev-YochaySackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel; The Infectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Yaniv LustigSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel; The Infectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Galia RahavSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv Israel; The Infectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPatients with cancer are at an increased risk for severe coronavirus disease of 2019, thus data on the safety and efficacy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are essential. We conducted this prospective study of patients with cancer vaccinated with BNT162b2 and monitored for antibody response and safety. The aim was to evaluate the rate of seropositivity and define predictors for non-reactive immune response. Furthermore, we evaluated the frequency and the severity of adverse events.

methodsThe study included patients with solid tumours undergoing anticancer treatment and immunocompetent health-care workers serving as controls. Serum titres of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralising antibodies were measured 2-4 weeks after each vaccine dose.

resultsThe analysis included 129 patients, of which 70.5% patients were metastatic. Patients were treated with chemotherapy (55%), immunotherapy (34.1%), biological agents (24.8%), hormonal treatment (8.5%) and radiotherapy (4.6%), that were given either alone or in combinations. The seropositivity rate among patients with cancer and controls was 32.4% versus 59.8% (p < 0.0001) after the first dose and 84.1% versus 98.9% (p < 0.0001) after the second dose, respectively. Median RBD-IgG titre was lower among patients than controls (p < 0.0001). Patients who were seronegative after the second dose had significantly more comorbidities than that with patients with seropositivity (77.8% vs 41.1%, respectively, p = 0.0042).

conclusionAdequate antibody response after BNT162b2 vaccination was achieved after two doses but not after one dose, in patients with cancer vaccinated during anticancer therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralAntineoplastic AgentsBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralAntineoplastic AgentsBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesCancerCo-morbiditiesCOVID19IgGImmunoglobulinOncologySARS-CoV-2SeronegativitySeropositivityVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34508994
PMCPMC8424105
OpenAlexW3197987398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.