Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34508586›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2022

Genetic modeling of GNAO1 disorder delineates mechanisms of Gαo dysfunction.

Dandan Wang, Maria Dao, Brian S Muntean, Andrew C Giles, Kirill A Martemyanov, Brock Grill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. G-protein regulatory network governs receptor internalization dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Decoding GNAO1 mutations usingFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dyskinetic crisis inFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dandan WangCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Maria DaoDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Brian S MunteanDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Andrew C GilesDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Kirill A MartemyanovDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Brock GrillCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Scripps Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Regulation of Striatal Signaling by RGS ProteinsR01DA036596 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Kirill A. Martemyanov · 2014 to 2026
$6.5M
Molecular genetic mechanisms of opioid receptor signalingR01DA048036 · NIDA · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Brock Grill, Kirill A. Martemyanov · 2019 to 2026
$5.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036596NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GNAO1 encephalopathy is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a spectrum of symptoms that include dystonic movements, seizures and developmental delay. While numerous GNAO1 mutations are associated with this disorder, the functional consequences of pathological variants are not completely understood. Here, we deployed the invertebrate C. elegans as a whole-animal behavioral model to study the functional effects of GNAO1 disorder-associated mutations. We tested several pathological GNAO1 mutations for effects on locomotor behaviors using a combination of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing and transgenic overexpression in vivo. We report that all three mutations tested (G42R, G203R and R209C) result in strong loss of function defects when evaluated as homozygous CRISPR alleles. In addition, mutations produced dominant negative effects assessed using both heterozygous CRISPR alleles and transgenic overexpression. Experiments in mice confirmed dominant negative effects of GNAO1 G42R, which impaired numerous motor behaviors. Thus, GNAO1 pathological mutations result in conserved functional outcomes across animal models. Our study further establishes the molecular genetic basis of GNAO1 encephalopathy, and develops a CRISPR-based pipeline for functionally evaluating mutations associated with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesNeurodevelopmental DisordersAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDisease Models, AnimalGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoGTP-Binding ProteinsMiceMutationGNAO1 protein, mouseGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoGTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34508586
PMCPMC8863422
OpenAlexW3197560907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.