Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34508352›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Integrative analysis of epigenetics data identifies gene-specific regulatory elements.

Florian Schmidt, Alexander Marx, Nina Baumgarten, Marie Hebel, Martin Wegner, Manuel Kaulich, Matthias S Leisegang, Ralf P Brandes, Jonathan Göke, Jilles Vreeken and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Churros: a Docker-based pipeline for large-scale epigenomic analysis.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian SchmidtCluster of Excellence for Multimodal Computing and Interaction, Saarland University, Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-6207
Alexander MarxCluster of Excellence for Multimodal Computing and Interaction, Saarland University, Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Nina BaumgartenInstitute for Cardiovascular Regeneration, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marie HebelInstitute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt - Medical Faculty, University Hospital, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Martin WegnerInstitute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt - Medical Faculty, University Hospital, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Manuel KaulichInstitute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt - Medical Faculty, University Hospital, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9528-8822
Matthias S LeisegangGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site RheinMain, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ralf P BrandesGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site RheinMain, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jonathan GökeLaboratory of Computational Transcriptomics, Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, 138672 Singapore, Singapore.
Jilles VreekenCISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Marcel H SchulzCluster of Excellence for Multimodal Computing and Interaction, Saarland University, Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-3656
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEMax Planck Institute for Informatics · DEGenome Institute of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how epigenetic variation in non-coding regions is involved in distal gene-expression regulation is an important problem. Regulatory regions can be associated to genes using large-scale datasets of epigenetic and expression data. However, for regions of complex epigenomic signals and enhancers that regulate many genes, it is difficult to understand these associations. We present StitchIt, an approach to dissect epigenetic variation in a gene-specific manner for the detection of regulatory elements (REMs) without relying on peak calls in individual samples. StitchIt segments epigenetic signal tracks over many samples to generate the location and the target genes of a REM simultaneously. We show that this approach leads to a more accurate and refined REM detection compared to standard methods even on heterogeneous datasets, which are challenging to model. Also, StitchIt REMs are highly enriched in experimentally determined chromatin interactions and expression quantitative trait loci. We validated several newly predicted REMs using CRISPR-Cas9 experiments, thereby demonstrating the reliability of StitchIt. StitchIt is able to dissect regulation in superenhancers and predicts thousands of putative REMs that go unnoticed using peak-based approaches suggesting that a large part of the regulome might be uncharted water.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationChromatinHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsChromatin

Identifiers

PMID34508352
PMCPMC8501997
OpenAlexW3197217231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.