Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34508299›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Quantitative Three-Dimensional Assessment of the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Intra- and Peri-tumoural Tissues on Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

A Niukkanen, H Okuma, M Sudah, P Auvinen, A Mannermaa, T Liimatainen, R Vanninen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hybrid [Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Development of an Automated CAD System for Lesion Detection in DCE-MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A NiukkanenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, PO BOX 100, 70029, KYS, Kuopio, Finland. antoni@uef.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-7289-2341
H OkumaDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, PO BOX 100, 70029, KYS, Kuopio, Finland.
M SudahDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, PO BOX 100, 70029, KYS, Kuopio, Finland.
P AuvinenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
A MannermaaInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
T LiimatainenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, PO BOX 100, 70029, KYS, Kuopio, Finland.
R VanninenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, PO BOX 100, 70029, KYS, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) segmentation and to investigate whether semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters are associated with traditional prognostic factors for breast cancer. In addition, we evaluated whether both intra-tumoural and peri-tumoural DCE parameters can differentiate the breast cancers that are more aggressive from those that are less aggressive. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer and structural breast MRI (3.0 T) were included after informed consent. Fifty-six patients (mean age, 57 years) with mass lesions of > 7 mm in diameter were included. A semi-automatic image post-processing algorithm was developed to measure 3D pharmacokinetic information from the DCE-MRI images. The kinetic parameters were extracted from time-signal curves, and the absolute tissue contrast agent concentrations were calculated with a reference tissue model. Markedly, higher intra-tumoural and peri-tumoural tissue concentrations of contrast agent were found in high-grade tumours (n = 44) compared to low-grade tumours (n = 12) at every time point (P = 0.006-0.040), providing positive predictive values of 90.6-92.6% in the classification of high-grade tumours. The intra-tumoural and peri-tumoural signal enhancement ratios correlated with tumour grade, size, and Ki67 activity. The intra-observer reproducibility was excellent. We developed a model to measure the 3D intensity data of breast cancers. Low- and high-grade tumours differed in their intra-tumoural and peri-tumoural enhancement characteristics. We anticipate that pharmacokinetic parameters will be increasingly used as imaging biomarkers to model and predict tumour behavior, prognoses, and responses to treatment.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsContrast MediaBreast cancerDynamic contrast-enhancedMRIPeri-tumouralPharmacokineticReference tissue model

Identifiers

PMID34508299
PMCPMC8555007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.