Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34508295›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2022

Nilotinib vs. imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 10-year follow‑up of the Japanese subgroup of the randomized ENESTnd trial.

Hirohisa Nakamae, Masahide Yamamoto, Emiko Sakaida, Yoshinobu Kanda, Ken Ohmine, Takaaki Ono, Itaru Matsumura, Maho Ishikawa, Makoto Aoki, Akio Maki and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hirohisa NakamaeHematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. hirohisa@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-990X
Masahide YamamotoDepartment of Hematology, Medical Hospital of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Emiko SakaidaDepartment of Hematology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshinobu KandaDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Ken OhmineDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Takaaki OnoDivision of Hematology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Itaru MatsumuraDepartment of Hematology, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Maho IshikawaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Makoto AokiNovartis Pharma KK, Tokyo, Japan.
Akio MakiNovartis Pharma KK, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohiko ShibayamaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 10-year analysis of Japanese patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP in the ENESTnd trial, nilotinib yielded higher cumulative response rates. There were no new occurrences of disease progression or deaths since the 5-year analysis. Cumulative 10-year rates of MMR and MR

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleBlast CrisisDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrimidinesImatinib MesylatenilotinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrimidinesCML-CPENESTndJapaneseLong termNilotinib

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.