Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34508153›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2022

Association of prenatal substance use disorders with pregnancy and birth outcomes following bariatric surgery.

Jaewhan Kim, Lance Davidson, Steven Hunt, Nathan Richards, Ted Adams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaewhan KimDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, 520 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. jaewhan.kim@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8147-1159
Lance DavidsonDepartment of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, 271 SFH, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1383-0666
Steven HuntDepartment of Genetic Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Education City Qatar Foundation, PO Box 24144, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-2170
Nathan RichardsIntermountain Health Care, 5300 South State Street, Murray, UT, USA.
Ted AdamsDivision of Epidemiology, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · USBrigham Young University · USIntermountain Healthcare · USWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesWhile an increased risk for substance use disorders (SUD) and also for several adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery have been well documented when considered separately, an association between these important risk factors has not been investigated. This study explored the potential dependence of these two bariatric surgery-related risks. SUBJECTS/

methodsThis study was a retrospective cohort study with adult women (18-45) who underwent bariatric surgery between 1996 and 2016 and who gave birth after surgery between 1996 and 2018. The study population consisted of 1849 post-bariatric surgery women with 3010 reported post-surgical births. Subjects with post-surgical, prenatal SUD were identified based on diagnosis codes extracted within the 10 months prior to delivery. Using random-effects logistic regression with retrospective cohort data, preterm birth, low birth weight, macrosomia, Caesarian delivery, congenital anomalies, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were considered as outcomes.

resultsAbout 10% (n = 289) of women had an SUD diagnosis within 10 months prior to child delivery. Women with SUD during pregnancy had significantly more pregnancy and birth complications compared to women without SUD: preterm birth (OR = 2.08, p = 0.03, 95% CI: 1.07-4.03), low birth weight (OR = 3.41, p < 0.01, 95% CI: 1.99-5.84), Caesarian delivery (OR = 9.71, p < 0.01, 95% CI: 2.69-35.05), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR = 3.87, p < 0.01, 95% CI: 2.04-7.34). Women with SUD had lower risk for macrosomia than women without SUD (OR = 0.07, p = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.70).

conclusionResults from this study demonstrated that post-bariatric surgery women who had SUD during pregnancy had significantly more pregnancy- and birth-related complications than post-surgery pregnant women without SUD, despite the reduction in macrosomia. Where possible, greater prenatal surveillance of post-surgery women with SUD should be considered.

Indexed as

AdultBariatric SurgeryCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareRetrospective StudiesSubstance-Related DisordersUtah

Identifiers

PMID34508153
OpenAlexW3197306763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.