Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34508073›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Distinct dynamics of neuronal activity during concurrent motor planning and execution.

David Eriksson, Mona Heiland, Artur Schneider, Ilka Diester

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David ErikssonOptophysiology, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Freiburg, Germany. david.eriksson@physiologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1282-2648
Mona HeilandOptophysiology, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-7115
Artur SchneiderOptophysiology, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Freiburg, Germany.
Ilka DiesterOptophysiology, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Freiburg, Germany. ilka.diester@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9362-0986
University of Freiburg · DERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The smooth conduct of movements requires simultaneous motor planning and execution according to internal goals. So far it remains unknown how such movement plans are modified without interfering with ongoing movements. Previous studies have isolated planning and execution-related neuronal activity by separating behavioral planning and movement periods in time by sensory cues. Here, we separate continuous self-paced motor planning from motor execution statistically, by experimentally minimizing the repetitiveness of the movements. This approach shows that, in the rat sensorimotor cortex, neuronal motor planning processes evolve with slower dynamics than movement-related responses. Fast-evolving neuronal activity precees skilled forelimb movements and is nested within slower dynamics. We capture this effect via high-pass filtering and confirm the results with optogenetic stimulations. The various dynamics combined with adaptation-based high-pass filtering provide a simple principle for separating concurrent motor planning and execution.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBehavior Observation TechniquesForelimbMaleModels, AnimalMotor SkillsMovementNeuronsOptogeneticsRatsRats, Long-EvansSensorimotor CortexStereotaxic Techniques

Identifiers

PMID34508073
PMCPMC8433382
OpenAlexW3198330721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.