Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34507822›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2021

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on lung injury and haemodynamics during experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and near-apnoeic ventilation.

Joaquin Araos, Leyla Alegria, Aline Garcia, Pablo Cruces, Dagoberto Soto, Benjamín Erranz, Tatiana Salomon, Tania Medina, Patricio Garcia, Sebastián Dubó and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Joaquin AraosDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Leyla AlegriaDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Aline GarciaDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo CrucesCenter of Acute Respiratory Critical Illness, Santiago, Chile; Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Unidad de Pacientes Críticos Pediátrica, Hospital El Carmen Dr Luis Valentín Ferrada, Santiago, Chile.
Dagoberto SotoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Benjamín ErranzCentro de Medicina Regenerativa, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Tatiana SalomonUnidad de Pacientes Críticos Pediátrica, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
Tania MedinaUnidad de Pacientes Críticos Pediátrica, Hospital El Carmen Dr Luis Valentín Ferrada, Santiago, Chile.
Patricio GarciaDepartamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sebastián DubóDepartamento de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
María C BachmannDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Roque BasoaltoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Emilio D ValenzuelaDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Maximiliano RovegnoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Magdalena VeraDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Jaime RetamalDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Center of Acute Respiratory Critical Illness, Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo CornejoUnidad de Pacientes Críticos, Departamento de Medicina, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Center of Acute Respiratory Critical Illness, Santiago, Chile.
Guillermo BugedoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Center of Acute Respiratory Critical Illness, Santiago, Chile.
Alejandro BruhnDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Center of Acute Respiratory Critical Illness, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: alejandrobruhn@gmail.com.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLClínica Alemana · CLHospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile · CLUniversidad Andrés Bello · CLUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung rest has been recommended during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) confers lung protection during ECMO for severe ARDS is unclear. We compared the effects of three different PEEP levels whilst applying near-apnoeic ventilation in a model of severe ARDS treated with ECMO.

methodsAcute respiratory distress syndrome was induced in anaesthetised adult male pigs by repeated saline lavage and injurious ventilation for 1.5 h. After ECMO was commenced, the pigs received standardised near-apnoeic ventilation for 24 h to maintain similar driving pressures and were randomly assigned to PEEP of 0, 10, or 20 cm H

resultsAll pigs developed severe ARDS. Oxygenation on ECMO improved with PEEP of 10 or 20 cm H

conclusionsDuring near-apnoeic ventilation and ECMO in experimental severe ARDS, 10 cm H

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHemodynamicsLung InjuryMalePositive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary Gas ExchangeRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeSeverity of Illness IndexSwineacute respiratory distress syndromeextracorporeal membrane oxygenationmechanical ventilationpositive end-expiratory pressureventilator-induced lung injury

Identifiers

PMID34507822
PMCPMC8449633
OpenAlexW3198907571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.