Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34507611›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2021

The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour.

Shuchita Mundle, Hillary Bracken, Vaishali Khedikar, Jayashree Mulik, Brian Faragher, Thomas Easterling, Simon Leigh, Paul Granby, Alan Haycox, Mark A Turner and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methods of induction of labour: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Shuchita MundleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Hillary BrackenGynuity Health Projects (GHP), 220 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Vaishali KhedikarDaga Memorial Women's Government Hospital, Nagpur, India, 440018.
Jayashree MulikGovernment Medical College, Nagpur, 440003, India.
Brian FaragherLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Thomas EasterlingUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Simon LeighNexus Clinical Analytics, Euxton, PR7 6BX, Lancashire, UK.
Paul GranbyCertus Analytics, Formby, Liverpool, L37 2LR, UK.
Alan HaycoxUniversity of Liverpool Management School, Chatham Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZH, UK.
Mark A TurnerUniversity of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital for Liverpool Health Partners, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.
Kate LightlyUniversity of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital for Liverpool Health Partners, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.
Miroslava EbringerUniversity of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital for Liverpool Health Partners, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.
Zarko AlfirevicUniversity of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital for Liverpool Health Partners, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.
Beverly WinikoffGynuity Health Projects (GHP), 220 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Andrew D WeeksUniversity of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital for Liverpool Health Partners, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK. aweeks@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-337X
University of Liverpool · GBGovernment Medical College · INGynuity Health Projects · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur · INCertus Technology (United Kingdom) · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

DFID/MRC/Wellcome Trust through the Joint Global Health Trials Scheme G1100686/1Medical Research Council G1100686Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInduction of labour (IOL), or starting labour artificially, can be a lifesaving intervention for pregnant women and their babies, and rates are rising significantly globally. As rates increase, it becomes increasingly important to fully evaluate all available data, especially that from low income settings where the potential benefits and harms are greater. The goal of this paper is to describe the datasets collected as part of the Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study, a randomised trial comparing two of the recommended methods of cervical ripening for labour induction, oral misoprostol and Foley catheter, in women being induced for hypertension in pregnancy, at two sites in India during 2013-15. DATA DESCRIPTION: This dataset includes comprehensive data on 602 women who underwent IOL for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Women were randomly assigned to cervical ripening with oral misoprostol or a transcervical Foley catheter in two government hospitals in India. The main dataset has 367 variables including monitoring during the induction of labour, medications administered, timing and mode of delivery, measures of neonatal morbidity and mortality, maternal mortality and morbidity, maternal satisfaction and health economic data. The dataset is anonymised and available on ReShare.

Indexed as

HypertensionMisoprostolOxytocicsCathetersCervical RipeningFemaleHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedPregnancyMisoprostolOxytocicsDatasetFoley catheterHypertensionInductionLabourMisoprostolPre-eclampsia

Identifiers

PMID34507611
PMCPMC8434713
OpenAlexW3197940277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.