ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
Mining microbe-disease interactions from literature via a transfer learning model.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight single-view contrastive learning hypergraph neural network for food-microbe-disease association prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Response to 'Methodological and statistical concerns in MINERVA microbiome-disease knowledge graph' by Salvatore Chirumbolo.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- MINERVA-microbiome network research and visualization atlas: a scalable knowledge graph for mapping microbiome-disease associations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- DiMB-RE: mining the scientific literature for diet-microbiome associations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Harnessing dual variational autoencoders to decode microbe roles in diseases for traditional medicine discovery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- A computational model for potential microbe-disease association detection based on improved graph convolutional networks and multi-channel autoencoders.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Recent advances in deep learning and language models for studying the microbiome.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Leveraging pre-trained language models for mining microbiome-disease relationships.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Systematic optimization of host-directed therapeutic targets and preclinical validation of repositioned antiviral drugs.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Hierarchical shared transfer learning for biomedical named entity recognition.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Large scale text mining for deriving useful insights: A case study focused on microbiome.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInteractions of microbes and diseases are of great importance for biomedical research. However, large-scale of microbe-disease interactions are hidden in the biomedical literature. The structured databases for microbe-disease interactions are in limited amounts. In this paper, we aim to construct a large-scale database for microbe-disease interactions automatically. We attained this goal via applying text mining methods based on a deep learning model with a moderate curation cost. We also built a user-friendly web interface that allows researchers to navigate and query required information.
resultsFirstly, we manually constructed a golden-standard corpus and a sliver-standard corpus (SSC) for microbe-disease interactions for curation. Moreover, we proposed a text mining framework for microbe-disease interaction extraction based on a pretrained model BERE. We applied named entity recognition tools to detect microbe and disease mentions from the free biomedical texts. After that, we fine-tuned the pretrained model BERE to recognize relations between targeted entities, which was originally built for drug-target interactions or drug-drug interactions. The introduction of SSC for model fine-tuning greatly improved detection performance for microbe-disease interactions, with an average reduction in error of approximately 10%. The MDIDB website offers data browsing, custom searching for specific diseases or microbes, and batch downloading.
conclusionsEvaluation results demonstrate that our method outperform the baseline model (rule-based PKDE4J) with an average [Formula: see text]-score of 73.81%. For further validation, we randomly sampled nearly 1000 predicted interactions by our model, and manually checked the correctness of each interaction, which gives a 73% accuracy. The MDIDB webiste is freely avaliable throuth http://dbmdi.com/index/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.