Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34507304›Full record

ArticleBiofabrication2021

A biofabrication method to align cells within bioprinted photocrosslinkable and cell-degradable hydrogel constructs via embedded fibers.

Margaret E Prendergast, Matthew D Davidson, Jason A Burdick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofabrication, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Omnidirectional 3D Printing of Anisotropic Nanofibrous Peptide Hydrogels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Organoid bioprinting to pattern the matrix microenvironment.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margaret E PrendergastDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-5385
Matthew D DavidsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9177-4006
Jason A BurdickDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-332X

Funding

Dynamic Fibrous Scaffolds for Repairing Dense Connective TissuesR01AR056624 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason A Burdick, Robert L Mauck · 2009 to 2026
$7.5M
Tunable Synthetic ECMs for Investigating Stellate Cell Activation and MigrationF32DK117568 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIDSON, MATTHEW DAVID · 2018 to 2021
$223k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056624NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK117568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is composed of biochemical and biophysical cues that control cell behaviors and bulk mechanical properties. For example, anisotropy of the ECM and cell alignment are essential in the directional properties of tissues such as myocardium, tendon, and the knee meniscus. Technologies are needed to introduce anisotropic behavior into biomaterial constructs that can be used for the engineering of tissues as models and towards translational therapies. To address this, we developed an approach to align hydrogel fibers within cell-degradable bioink filaments with extrusion printing, where shear stresses during printing align fibers and photocrosslinking stabilizes the fiber orientation. Suspensions of hydrogel fibers were produced through the mechanical fragmentation of electrospun scaffolds of norbornene-modified hyaluronic acid, which were then encapsulated with meniscal fibrochondrocytes, mesenchymal stromal cells, or cardiac fibroblasts within gelatin-methacrylamide bioinks during extrusion printing into agarose suspension baths. Bioprinting parameters such as the needle diameter and the bioink flow rate influenced shear profiles, whereas the suspension bath properties and needle translation speed influenced filament diameters and uniformity. When optimized, filaments were formed with high levels of fiber alignment, which resulted in directional cell spreading during culture over one week. Controls that included bioprinted filaments without fibers or non-printed hydrogels of the same compositions either with or without fibers resulted in random cell spreading during culture. Further, constructs were printed with variable fiber and resulting cell alignment by varying print direction or using multi-material printing with and without fibers. This biofabrication technology advances our ability to fabricate constructs containing aligned cells towards tissue repair and the development of physiological tissue models.

Indexed as

BioprintingHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsHydrogelsalignmentanisotropybioprintingfibershydrogel

Identifiers

PMID34507304
PMCPMC8603602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.