Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34507160›Full record

ReviewRedox biology2021

The potentials of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules in cancer treatment: An outlook from ROS biology and medicine.

Thi Thuy Tien Vo, Quang Canh Vo, Vo Phuoc Tuan, Yinshen Wee, Hsin-Chung Cheng, I-Ta Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Redox biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Recent advances in the role of gasotransmitters in necroptosis.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Thi Thuy Tien VoSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Quang Canh VoDepartment of Dental Biomaterials Science, Dental Research Institute and BK21 Plus Program, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Vo Phuoc TuanEndoscopy Department, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Yinshen WeeDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hsin-Chung ChengSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Dentistry, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
I-Ta LeeSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: itlee0128@tmu.edu.tw.
Taipei Medical University · TWCho Ray Hospital · VNSeoul National University · KRTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO) is now well recognized a pivotal endogenous signaling molecule in mammalian lives. The proof-of-concept employing chemical carriers of exogenous CO as prodrugs for CO release, also known as CO-releasing molecules (CO-RMs), has been appreciated. The major advantage of CO-RMs is that they are able to deliver CO to the target sites in a controlled manner. There is an increasing body of experimental studies suggesting the therapeutic potentials of CO and CO-RMs in different cancer models. This review firstly presents a short but crucial view concerning the characteristics of CO and CO-RMs. Then, the anticancer activities of CO-RMs that target many cancer hallmarks, mainly proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and invasion and metastasis, are discussed. However, their anticancer activities are varying and cell-type specific. The aerobic metabolism of molecular oxygen inevitably generates various oxygen-containing reactive metabolites termed reactive oxygen species (ROS) which play important roles in both physiology and pathophysiology. Although ROS act as a double-edged sword in cancer, both sides of which may potentially have been exploited for therapeutic benefits. The main focus of the present review is thus to identify the possible signaling network by which CO-RMs can exert their anticancer actions, where ROS play the central role. Another important issue concerning the potential effect of CO-RMs on the aerobic glycolysis (the Warburg effect) which is a feature of cancer metabolic reprogramming is given before the conclusion with future prospects on the challenges of developing CO-RMs into clinically pharmaceutical candidates in cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Carbon MonoxideNeoplasmsAnimalsBiologyOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesCarbon MonoxideOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesApoptosisCarbon monoxideCarbon monoxide-releasing moleculesPro-tumorigenic pathwaysReactive oxygen speciesWarburg effect

Identifiers

PMID34507160
PMCPMC8427320
OpenAlexW3196463433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.