Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34507079›Full record

SynthesisJournal of critical care2021

ROX index as a good predictor of high flow nasal cannula failure in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jay Prakash, Pradip Kumar Bhattacharya, Arun Kumar Yadav, Amit Kumar, Lal Chand Tudu, Kameshwar Prasad

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of critical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Beyond High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Non-invasive Ventilation: The Need for Dynamic Physiological Monitoring in Pediatric Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Early Prediction of High-flow Nasal Cannula Failure in Children: Clarifying the Evidence Behind the Pediatric HACOR Score.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jay PrakashDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. Electronic address: dr.jay_prakash@rediffmail.com.
Pradip Kumar BhattacharyaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Arun Kumar YadavDepartment of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Amit KumarDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Lal Chand TuduDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Kameshwar PrasadProfessor of Neurology and Director, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrediction of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) may improve clinical management and stratification of patients for optimal treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine performance of ROX index as a predictor of HFNC failure. MATERIALS AND

methodsSystematic search was performed in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) for articles published till 15 June 2021 investigating ROX index as a predictor for HFNC failure. Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to analyze risk of bias for prognostic factors, by two independent authors.

resultsEight retrospective or prospective cohort studies involving 1301 patients showed a good discriminatory value, summary area under the curve (sAUC) 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84) with sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) and specificity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.88) for predicting HNFC failure. The positive and negative likelihood ratio were 3.0 (95% CI, 2.2-5.3) and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.28-0.50) respectively, and was strongly associated with a promising predictive accuracy (Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 9, 95% CI, 5-16).

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests ROX index has good discriminating power for prediction of HFNC failure in COVID-19 patients with AHRF.

Indexed as

COVID-19Noninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyCannulaHumansOxygen Inhalation TherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Acute hypoxemic respiratory failureCOVID-19High flow nasal cannulaROX index

Identifiers

PMID34507079
PMCPMC8424061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.