ArticleResuscitation2021
Novel application of thoracic impedance to characterize ventilations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the pragmatic airway resuscitation trial.
Article in Resuscitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defining thoracic impedance thresholds for rescue ventilation: a laboratory study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Contemporary issues in pediatric prehospital airway management.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- Ventilation Rates and Capnography in Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Advanced Airways.Prehospital emergency care · 2025Article
- Cricothyroidotomy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation and Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Study.Circulation · 2023Article
- Impedance-Based Ventilation Detection and Signal Quality Control During Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSignificant challenges exist in measuring ventilation quality during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) outcomes. Since ventilation is associated with outcomes in cardiac arrest, tools that objectively describe ventilation dynamics are needed. We sought to characterize thoracic impedance (TI) oscillations associated with ventilation waveforms in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART).
methodsWe analyzed CPR process files collected from adult OHCA enrolled in PART. We limited the analysis to cases with simultaneous capnography ventilation recordings at the Dallas-Fort Worth site. We identified ventilation waveforms in the thoracic impedance signal by applying automated signal processing with adaptive filtering techniques to remove overlying artifacts from chest compressions. We correlated detected ventilations with the end-tidal capnography signals. We determined the amplitudes (Ai, Ae) and durations (Di, De) of both insufflation and exhalation phases. We compared differences between laryngeal tube (LT) and endotracheal intubation (ETI) airway management during mechanical or manual chest compressions using Mann-Whitney U-test.
resultsWe included 303 CPR process cases in the analysis; 209 manual (77 ETI, 132 LT), 94 mechanical (41 ETI, 53 LT). Ventilation Ai and Ae were higher for ETI than LT in both manual (ETI: Ai 0.71 Ω, Ae 0.70 Ω vs LT: Ai 0.46 Ω, Ae 0.45 Ω; p < 0.01 respectively) and mechanical chest compressions (ETI: Ai 1.22 Ω, Ae 1.14 Ω VS LT: Ai 0.74 Ω, Ae 0.68 Ω; p < 0.01 respectively). Ventilations per minute, duration of TI amplitude insufflation and exhalation did not differ among groups.
conclusionCompared with LT, ETI thoracic impedance ventilation insufflation and exhalation amplitude were higher while duration did not differ. TI may provide a novel approach to characterizing ventilation during OHCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.