ReviewUrology2022
Social Determinants of Kidney Stone Disease: The Impact of Race, Income and Access on Urolithiasis Treatment and Outcomes.
Review in Urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trends in kidney stone disease: a 5-year update of stone management in England and Scotland.BJU international · 2026Article
- The association between quality of life, intensity of counseling and health literacy amongst patients with nephrolithiasis.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Patients with Urolithiasis Regarding Stone Examination Methods: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Ethnic diversity and urolithiasis: a single-center experience.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Validation of the Patient Activation Measure in kidney stone disease patients.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and nation burden of urolithiasis in young adults from 1990 to 2021: analysis of data from the global burden of disease study 2021.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Impact of race and ethnicity on clinical outcomes and recurrence post-ureteral reconstruction.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- A Systematic Scoping Review of Comparative Effectiveness Studies in Kidney Stone Disease.Urology · 2024Article
- Predictive model of systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi based on logistic regression.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The medical and surgical management of kidney stones is one of the most common functions of the urologist. Management choices are often nuanced, involving the decision to embark on one surgical plan among several options. As the wider medical community critically evaluates the care we provide to an increasingly diverse population, it will be important to examine patient outcomes with a particular focus on ensuring equitable care. This review examines the influence of social parameters on the care of kidney stone patients. The dearth of literature in this area warrants rigorous studies on the relationship between race as well as socioeconomic status and the management of kidney stone disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34506806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.