Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34506673›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Implementation of an Embedded In-Clinic Genetic Testing Station to Optimize Germline Testing for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Evan J Walker, Dena Goldberg, Kelly M Gordon, Christina Pedley, Julia Carnevale, Pelin Cinar, Eric A Collisson, Margaret A Tempero, Andrew H Ko, Amie M Blanco and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mainstreaming genetic testing in community oncology settings.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost-effectiveness of Lynch Syndrome Screening in Colorectal Cancer: Universal Germline vs Sequential Screening.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Enhancing management of pancreatic cancer: impact of a same day multidisciplinary clinic on access to guideline-directed care.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hereditary Cancer Clinics Improve Adherence to NCCN Germline Testing Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan J Walker *Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-190X
Dena Goldberg *Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kelly M GordonHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Christina PedleyDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Julia CarnevaleDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Pelin CinarDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Eric A CollissonDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Margaret A TemperoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Andrew H KoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Amie M BlancoHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Mallika DhawanDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGermline genetic testing is universally recommended for patients with pancreatic cancer, but testing remains infrequent. In May 2018, we implemented a systematic patient intake workflow featuring an in-clinic genetic testing station (GTS) at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) to expedite genetic counseling and facilitate sample collection. We sought to determine the impact of this innovation on rates of genetic counseling and testing.

methodsMedical records, patient intake records, and genetic test reports were retrospectively reviewed for new patients with pancreatic cancer eligible for germline testing at UCSF from May 2018 to May 2019. Primary outcomes included the rate of offered genetic counseling and confirmed germline testing. Data were compared for periods before and after GTS implementation. Associations between demographic characteristics and testing rates were assessed.

resultsGenetic counseling/testing was offered to 209 (94%) of 223 eligible patients, and 158 (71%) completed testing (135 at UCSF, 23 elsewhere). Compared with a traditional referral-based genetic counseling model, confirmed testing increased from 19% to 71%, patient attrition between referral and genetics appointment decreased from 36% to 3%, and rate of pathogenic variant detection increased from 20% to 33%. Patients who were younger, identified as non-Hispanic White, and spoke English as a primary language were more likely to complete testing.

conclusionsImplementation of a systematic patient intake workflow and in-clinic GTS resulted in the highest reported real-world rate of germline testing for patients with pancreatic cancer. Health care disparities were identified and will guide future innovation. This report provides a model for other centers to create a similar testing infrastructure. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study demonstrates that a systematic patient intake workflow and associated in-clinic genetic testing station improve delivery of genetic counseling and completion of germline testing for patients with pancreatic cancer. This study achieved, to the authors' knowledge, the highest real-world rate of confirmed genetic testing in this patient population. This article describes this innovation in detail to guide replication at other medical centers and facilitate guideline-concordant care for patients with pancreatic cancer. This infrastructure can also be applied to other cancers for which germline testing is recommended.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaPancreatic NeoplasmsGenetic TestingGerm CellsHumansRetrospective StudiesGenetic testingGuideline adherencePancreatic neoplasmsPrecision medicineQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34506673
PMCPMC8571767
OpenAlexW3198536716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.