ArticlePloS one2021
Ion transport activity and optogenetics capability of light-driven Na+-pump KR2.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Detailed View on the (Re)isomerization Dynamics in Microbial Rhodopsins Using Complementary Near-UV and IR Readouts.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Optogenetics and Targeted Gene Therapy for Retinal Diseases: Unravelling the Fundamentals, Applications, and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Light-Driven Sodium Pump as a Potential Tool for the Control of Seizures in Epilepsy.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Article
- KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Protein dynamics of a light-driven NaBiophysics and physicobiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Applications and challenges of rhodopsin-based optogenetics in biomedicine.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
KR2 from marine bacteria Krokinobacter eikastus is a light-driven Na+ pumping rhodopsin family (NaRs) member that actively transports Na+ and/or H+ depending on the ionic state. We here report electrophysiological studies on KR2 to address ion-transport properties under various electrochemical potentials of Δ[Na+], ΔpH, membrane voltage and light quality, because the contributions of these on the pumping activity were less understood so far. After transient expression of KR2 in mammalian cultured cells (ND7/23 cells), photocurrents were measured by whole-cell patch clamp under various intracellular Na+ and pH conditions. When KR2 was continuously illuminated with LED light, two distinct time constants were obtained depending on the Na+ concentration. KR2 exhibited slow ion transport (τoff of 28 ms) below 1.1 mM NaCl and rapid transport (τoff of 11 ms) above 11 mM NaCl. This indicates distinct transporting kinetics of H+ and Na+. Photocurrent amplitude (current density) depends on the intracellular Na+ concentration, as is expected for a Na+ pump. The M-intermediate in the photocycle of KR2 could be transferred into the dark state without net ion transport by blue light illumination on top of green light. The M intermediate was stabilized by higher membrane voltage. Furthermore, we assessed the optogenetic silencing effect of rat cortical neurons after expressing KR2. Light power dependency revealed that action potential was profoundly inhibited by 1.5 mW/mm2 green light illumination, confirming the ability to apply KR2 as an optogenetics silencer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.