ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2021
Prevalence of Gastritis in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndoscopic examination is one of the commonest procedures done in day-to-day practice in evaluating gastrointestinal problems. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy provides an excellent view of mucosal surfaces of the esophagus, stomach, and proximal duodenum. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is utilized for various diagnostic and therapeutic reasons. This study aimed to study the prevalence of gastritis in a tertiary health care center in Pokhara.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital, Pokhara. After ethical approval from the institutional review board with Ref No: 070/2077/2078, endoscopic records of 889 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy from May 2018 to April 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The convenience sampling method was used. Data entry and descriptive analysis were done in SPSS version 21.0. Descriptive statistics were performed.
resultsA total of 889 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during a period of 12 months period were studied. Among them, females were 472 (53.1%) and males were 417 (46.9%). The mean age of the study population was 45.6 years (SD, 16.86). The majority of the patients belonged to the age group 30 to 50 years. Gastritis was the most common finding in 452 (50.8%) cases.
conclusionsGastritis was the most common finding in the patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A significant proportion of people had normal endoscopy findings. Optimal selection of cases is needed to avoid overuse in younger and encourage use in older populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.