Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34506015›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review.

Katrina Clair Cockburn, Zaher Toumi, Alison Mackie, Peter Julyan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katrina Clair CockburnNorthern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Hollyhurst Road, Darlington, DL3 6HX, UK. katrina.cockburn@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-4593
Zaher ToumiDepartment of General Surgery, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Hollyhurst Road, Darlington, DL3 6HX, UK.
Alison MackieNorthern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Hollyhurst Road, Darlington, DL3 6HX, UK.
Peter JulyanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Christie Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadioguided surgery (RGS) for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) has been suggested as a way to improve intraoperative lesion detection. This systematic literature review of reports of the use of RGS for GEP-NETs was performed to determine if there is a benefit.

methodsA literature search was conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed, and snowballing from any relevant literature. Full-text studies were included if they were published in the English language and reported outcomes of RGS on human subjects with GEP-NETs. Qualitative data synthesis was performed.

resultsTwenty-six papers including a total of 209 patients were included. The tracers used were predominantly indium-111 pentetreotide, gallium-68 DOTA-peptides, and technetium-99m EDDA/HYNIC-peptides. Heterogeneous protocols make comparisons difficult, but most papers reported a benefit from the use of RGS in tumours in the gastrointestinal tract; utility in localisation of pancreatic tumours was less clear. Time between tracer administration and operation varied: from 16 h to 8 days with indium-111, 0-24 h with technetium-99m, and 19-193 min with gallium-68. Eight teams reported the thresholding technique used for discrimination-four used a ratio, four statistical methods, and one looked at the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-offs. Six teams performed follow-up of 24 patients (three pancreas, eight gastrinoma, 13 gastrointestinal tract) for between 3 months and 3 years. Two patients relapsed (one pancreas, one gastrinoma) between 6 and 12 months post-surgery.

conclusionsRGS appears to aid in localisation of gastrointestinal NETs, but the benefit is more equivocal in pancreatic NETs. Further work into outcomes is warranted.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansDiagnostic techniquesNeuroendocrine tumours/surgeryRadioisotopeRadiopharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID34506015
PMCPMC8654712
OpenAlexW3197370154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.