ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2022
The auditory brain in action: Intention determines predictive processing in the auditory system-A review of current paradigms and findings.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying the Phenomenon of Inner Speaking-Induced Suppression.eNeuro · 2026Article
- The Impact of Action Intention Versus Action-Effect Intention on Auditory Prediction Error Signals.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Analysis of Task Demand Effects on Visual and Auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Across Autistic and Schizotypal Traits.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neural Correlates of Dynamic Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Unexpected Silence and Sound.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Action-effect proximity, order, and predictability differentially modulate electrophysiological responses and explicit judgements of agency.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Change detection in audio-visual space: neural evidence for age effects.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of sensory attenuation in the somatosensory and auditory modality within a virtual reality setup.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sensory Attenuation of Auditory P2 Responses is Modulated by the Sense of Action Timing Control.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Auditory N1 Suppression and Omission N1 Do Not Share a Common Underlying Mechanism.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Age-Related Differences in Neural Correlates of Auditory Spatial Change Detection in Real and Virtual Environments.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Gamma and Theta/Alpha-Band Oscillations in the Electroencephalogram Distinguish the Content of Inner Speech.eNeuro · 2025Article
- The readiness potential reflects detailed prediction of action outcome.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Auditory context-dependent distraction by unexpected visual stimuli.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Coordinates Contextual Mental Imagery for Single-Beat Manipulation during Rhythmic Sensorimotor Synchronization.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Somatosensory omissions reveal action-related predictive processing.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- My view on your actions: Dynamic changes in viewpoint-dependent auditory ERP attenuation during action observation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neuronal responses to omitted tones in the auditory brain: A neuronal correlate for predictive coding.Science advances · 2023Article
- Salient omissions-pupil dilation in response to unexpected omissions of sound and touch.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Sensory suppression and increased neuromodulation during actions disrupt memory encoding of unpredictable self-initiated stimuli.Psychophysiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the ideomotor theory, action may serve to produce desired sensory outcomes. Perception has been widely described in terms of sensory predictions arising due to top-down input from higher order cortical areas. Here, we demonstrate that the action intention results in reliable top-down predictions that modulate the auditory brain responses. We bring together several lines of research, including sensory attenuation, active oddball, and action-related omission studies: Together, the results suggest that the intention-based predictions modulate several steps in the sound processing hierarchy, from preattentive to evaluation-related processes, also when controlling for additional prediction sources (i.e., sound regularity). We propose an integrative theoretical framework-the extended auditory event representation system (AERS), a model compatible with the ideomotor theory, theory of event coding, and predictive coding. Initially introduced to describe regularity-based auditory predictions, we argue that the extended AERS explains the effects of action intention on auditory processing while additionally allowing studying the differences and commonalities between intention- and regularity-based predictions-we thus believe that this framework could guide future research on action and perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.