ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021
Effects of the Nasal Cavity Complexity on the Pharyngeal Airway Fluid Mechanics: A Computational Study.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational Rhinology: Unraveling Discrepancies between In Silico and In Vivo Nasal Airflow Assessments for Enhanced Clinical Decision Support.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of the human nasal airway complexity on the pharyngeal airway fluid mechanics is investigated at inspiration. It is the aim to find a suitable degree of geometrical reduction that allows for an efficient segmentation of the human airways from cone-beam computed tomography images. The flow physics is simulated by a lattice Boltzmann method on high-performance computers. For two patients, the flow field through the complete upper airway is compared to results obtained from three surface variants with continuously decreasing complexity. The most complex reduced airway model includes the middle and inferior turbinates, while the moderate model only features the inferior turbinates. In the simplest model, a pipe-like artificial structure is attached to the airway. For each model, the averaged pressure is computed at different cross sections. Furthermore, the flow fields are investigated by means of averaged velocity magnitudes, in-plane velocity vectors, and streamlines. By analyzing the averaged pressure loss from the nostrils to each cross section, it is found that only the most complex reduced models are capable of approximating the pressure distribution from the original geometries. In the moderate models, the geometry reductions lead to overpredictions of the pressure loss in the pharynx. Attaching a pipe-like structure leads to a higher deceleration of the incoming flow and underpredicted pressure losses and velocities, especially in the upper part of the pharynx. Dean-like vortices are observed in the moderate and pipe-like models, since their shape comes close to a [Formula: see text]-bend elbow pipe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.