Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505930›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2021

Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice-a prospective single-center trial.

Nora Isberner, Sabrina Kraus, Götz Ulrich Grigoleit, Fatemeh Aghai, Max Kurlbaum, Sebastian Zimmermann, Hartwig Klinker, Oliver Scherf-Clavel

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Begelomab (BEGESANDJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nora IsbernerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. isberner_n@ukw.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-9191
Sabrina KrausDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Götz Ulrich GrigoleitDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Fatemeh AghaiDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Max KurlbaumDepartment of Internal Medicine I and Core Unit Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sebastian ZimmermannInstitute of Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Hartwig KlinkerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Oliver Scherf-ClavelInstitute of Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Hector Foundation II STIF-99
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKnowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentration-dependent effects.

methods262 blood samples of 29 patients with acute or chronic GvHD who were administered Ruxolitinib during clinical routine were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic model obtained from myelofibrosis patients was adapted to our population and was used to identify relevant pharmacokinetic properties and covariates on drug exposure. Relationships between Ruxolitinib exposure and adverse events were assessed.

resultsMedian of individual mean trough serum concentrations was 39.9 ng/mL at 10 mg twice daily (IQR 27.1 ng/mL, range 5.6-99.8 ng/mL). Applying a population pharmacokinetic model revealed that concentrations in our cohort were significantly higher compared to myelofibrosis patients receiving the same daily dose (p < 0.001). Increased Ruxolitinib exposure was caused by a significant reduction in Ruxolitinib clearance by approximately 50%. Additional comedication with at least one strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitor led to a further reduction by 15% (p < 0.05). No other covariate affected pharmacokinetics significantly. Mean trough concentrations of patients requiring dose reduction related to adverse events were significantly elevated (p < 0.05).

conclusionRuxolitinib exposure is increased in GvHD patients in comparison to myelofibrosis patients due to reduced clearance and comedication with CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitors. Elevated Ruxolitinib trough concentrations might be a surrogate for toxicity.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsAcute DiseaseAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 InhibitorsCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedCYP2C9 protein, humanCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 InhibitorsCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibCYP2C9CYP3A4Graft versus host diseaseRuxolitinibTherapeutic drug monitoringToxicity

Identifiers

PMID34505930
PMCPMC8536600
OpenAlexW3198160001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.