Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505924›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2022

Mid-term results of the Remeex® readjustable sling for female complex stress urinary incontinence and sonographic hypomobile urethra.

Cristina Ros, Sílvia Escura, Sònia Anglès-Acedo, Marta Larroya, Eduardo Bataller, Lluís Amat, Emília Sánchez, Montserrat Espuña-Pons, Francisco Carmona

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The evolution of stress urinary incontinence treatment techniques of the last three decades.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cristina Ros *Pelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. cros@clinic.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-6420
Sílvia Escura *Pelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Sònia Anglès-AcedoPelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta LarroyaPelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Eduardo BatallerPelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Lluís AmatPelvic Floor Unit, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Emília SánchezPelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Montserrat Espuña-PonsPelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco CarmonaPelvic Floor Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWe aimed to evaluate the results of a readjustable sling (Remeex® system) among a selected group of women with complex stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with sonographic hypomobile urethra and assessing failure-related risk factors.

methodsObservational, longitudinal, prospective cohort study, including patients who underwent surgery with the Remeex® system. The primary outcome was a binary outcome in change of one level or more of the severity of urinary incontinence symptoms according to the intervals of the Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) score (mild, moderate, severe and very severe). Secondary outcomes were postsurgical complications, absolute ICIQ-UI-SF, 24-h pad weight test (24-h PT), urodynamic SUI and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score to evaluate subjective success.

resultsAmong 120 women included, after surgery we found a 70% subjective success rate, a 76.7% decrease of urinary incontinence severity and a mean reduction of the 24-h PT of 109.6 ± 291.4 g. Women with post-surgical decreased severity of incontinence had lower mean body mass index (BMI) and 24-h PT than those without incontinence severity changes with statistically significant differences (p = 0.028 and p = 0.027, respectively). A logistic regression model demonstrated that a 1-point increase of BMI increased the risk of persistence of incontinence severity after surgery by 19% (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.01-1.41; p = 0.040), and an increase of 10 g in the pre-surgical 24-h PT represented a 3% rise of the aforementioned risk (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; p = 0.034).

conclusionsIn patients with complex SUI and sonographic hypomobile urethra, use of a readjustable sling (Remeex® system) led to improvement of SUI. Patients with a greater BMI and pre-surgical 24-h PT showed worse results after surgery.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressFemaleHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrethraHypomobile urethraMid-urethral slingReadjustable slingRecurrent stress urinary incontinenceUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.