ArticleJAMA network open2021
Association of Population Screening for Breast Cancer Risk With Use of Mammography Among Women in Medically Underserved Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It's Not Just Cost": Barriers to Mammography Screening Access Among Low-income Women in the United States-A Scoping Review.Journal of cancer prevention · 2026Review
- Perceptions of the Acceptability of Community-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment among Underserved Latinas in Maricopa County, Arizona.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Underserved Latinas' Perceptions and Implications Around Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Long-term Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Addressing the overuse-underuse paradox in healthcare.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions Among Underserved, Hispanic Women: Implications for Risk-Based Approaches to Screening.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Provincial Variation in Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening in Canada: Evidence From the Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow's Health.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- The Importance of Including Underserved Populations in Research.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Culture, community, and cancer: understandings of breast cancer from a non-lived experience among women living in Soweto.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- A New Breast Density Assessment Method Using Portable Document Format.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Addressing fairness issues in deep learning-based medical image analysis: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Culture, community, and cancer: Understandings of breast cancer from a non-lived experience among women living in Soweto.Research square · 2024Article
- Informing Alzheimer's Biomarker Communication: Concerns and Understanding of Cognitively Unimpaired Adults During Amyloid Results Disclosure.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
- Rethinking screening mammography in Japan: next-generation breast cancer screening through breast awareness and supplemental ultrasonography.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Inequities in referrals to a breast cancer risk assessment and prevention clinic: a mixed methods study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Cancer-Specific health equity metrics in the United States of America: A scoping review.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Barriers to Mammography Screening among Black Women at a Community Health Center in South Florida, USA.Medical research archives · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byBeyond the2022
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Black women bear a disproportionate burden of breast cancer mortality in the US, in part due to inequities in the use of mammography. Population screening for breast cancer risk in primary care is a promising strategy for mitigating breast cancer disparities, but it is unknown whether this strategy would be associated with increased mammography rates in underserved women of racial and ethnic minority groups. Objective: To examine whether providing individualized breast cancer risk estimates is associated with an increase in the rate of screening mammography. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study was conducted in women receiving individualized risk estimates as part of routine primary health care at federally qualified health centers in medically underserved communities in Chicago, Illinois. The study was conducted from November 5, 2013, to December 19, 2014, with data acquisition completed on March 5, 2017; data analysis was performed from December 30, 2020, to February 2, 2021. A total of 347 women aged 25 to 69 years without a personal history of breast cancer presenting for an annual visit with their primary care clinician were enrolled. Exposures: Breast cancer risk estimates were obtained with validated risk assessment tools as a standard component of the clinic check-in process. One of 4 women at average risk and all women at high risk were invited to participate in the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mammography rate during 18 months of usual care compared with the rate during 18 months after implementation of risk assessment. Results: Of the 347 women enrolled, 188 were age-eligible for mammography and were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 50.8 [7.04] years); 70 women (37.2%) were Hispanic, 114 (60.6%) were non-Hispanic African American, and 4 (2.1%) were from other racial and ethnic groups (4 non-Hispanic White women). Ninety-eight women (52.1%) had an average risk of developing breast cancer and 90 (47.9%) were at high risk. Overall, there was a nonsignificant increase in the mammography rate, from 38.8% during usual care to 48.9% following implementation of risk assessment (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.92-2.03). In preplanned subgroup analysis, the mammography rate among women at high risk was significantly higher after vs before risk assessment (51.1% vs 36.6%; odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.10-3.23). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, providing individualized breast cancer risk estimates as a component of primary health care in federally qualified health centers was associated with increased use of mammography among women of racial and ethnic minority groups who were at high risk. Implementation of this approach in underserved communities could promote equity in the use of mammography and reduce racial disparities in breast cancer mortality. This strategy warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.