Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505833›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Collecting Social Media Information in a Substance Use Intervention Trial With Adolescent Girls With Lifetime Substance Use History: Observational Study.

Lili M C Ramos, Joseline Delgadillo, Sarah Vélez, Emily Dauria, Jamie Salas, Marina Tolou-Shams

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02293057 (Gender-Responsive Drug Use Treatment for Juvenile Justice Girls), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02293057 nacompletednot on this map

Gender-Responsive Drug Use Treatment for Juvenile Justice Girls

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2014 to 2020Enrolled132ConditionsDrug UseArmsVOICES Group, Girl Health Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lili M C RamosDepartment of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0279-6930
Joseline DelgadilloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-6947
Sarah VélezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-3431
Emily DauriaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-7782
Jamie SalasDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-7072
Marina Tolou-ShamsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-609X
University of California, San Francisco · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents with juvenile legal system contact face numerous barriers to participation in behavioral health intervention research, including housing disruption, legal privacy concerns, and systems mistrust. Technology, such as social media, may be a novel and developmentally appropriate adolescent research study engagement and retention tool.

objectiveWe examined data on social media information collected for study retention purposes from adolescents participating in a substance use intervention trial.

methodsData were collected as part of a randomized controlled trial determining efficacy of a group-based substance use intervention for girls and young women (12-24 years) with substance use histories referred from legal and school systems in the United States. Baseline demographic and social media information was analyzed from the subset of 114 adolescent girls (mean age 15.7 years; range 13-18 years), of whom 31.6% (36/114) were legally involved, 87.7% (100/114) belonged to minoritized racial/ethnic groups, and 32.5% (37/114) received public assistance.

resultsMost girls (74/114, 64.9%) provided at least one social media account (Instagram, 95% [70/74]; Facebook, 27% [20/74]; and Twitter, 11% [8/74]) during study enrollment. Legally involved girls were significantly less likely to provide social media information than school-referred girls (44% [16/36] versus 74% [58/78]; χ

conclusionsObtaining social media information for study retention purposes from adolescent girls with lifetime substance use appears possible; however, particular subgroups (ie, legally involved girls) may be less likely to provide accounts. Factors shaping legally involved girls' willingness to provide social media information, including mistrust and privacy concerns, and the impact of researcher's access to social media information on study retention are critical directions for future research.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02293057; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02293057.

Indexed as

adolescent girlshealth interventionlegal involvementsocial mediasubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34505833
PMCPMC8463944
OpenAlexW3196833043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.