Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505832›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2021

Efficacy of a Single-Session "Empowered Relief" Zoom-Delivered Group Intervention for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Maisa S Ziadni, Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro, Steven Anderson, Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy, Beth D Darnall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04546685 (Efficacy of a 1-Session Spanish "Empowered Relief" Videoconference-Delivered Group Intervention for Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04546685 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a 1-Session Spanish "Empowered Relief" Videoconference-Delivered Group Intervention for Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsChronic PainArmsUsual Care, Empowered Relief
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of empowered relief on pain catastrophizing and outcomes post-total knee arthroplasty: A quasi-experimental study.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maisa S ZiadniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8371-0646
Lluvia Gonzalez-CastroDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-4414
Steven AndersonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7729-6837
Parthasarathy KrishnamurthyC.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8924-0542
Beth D DarnallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3590-511X

Funding

Single Session Pain Catastrophizing Treatment: Comparative Efficacy & MechanismsR01AT008561 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DARNALL, BETH DENISE, MACKEY, SEAN C · 2015 to 2019
$3.9M
Single Session Pain Catastrophizing Class: Efficacy & Mechanisms for Reducing Opioid Use Among Chronic Pain PatientsK23DA047473 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZIADNI, MAISA · 2019 to 2023
$796k
Effect of pain catastrophizing on prescription opioid cravingK23DA048972 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YOU, DOKYOUNG SOPHIA · 2019 to 2023
$758k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008561NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA047473NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA048972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive behavioral therapy-pain is an evidence-based treatment for chronic pain that can have significant patient burden, including health care cost, travel, multiple sessions, and lack of access in remote areas.

objectiveThe study aims to pilot test the efficacy of a single-session videoconference-delivered empowered relief (ER) intervention compared to waitlist control (WLC) conditions among individuals with chronic pain. We hypothesized that ER would be superior to WLC in reducing pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and other pain-related outcomes at 1-3 months posttreatment.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial involving a web-based sample of adults (N=104) aged 18-80 years with self-reported chronic pain. Participants were randomized (1:1) to 1 of 2 unblinded study groups: ER (50/104, 48.1%) and WLC (54/104, 51.9%). Participants allocated to ER completed a Zoom-delivered class, and all participants completed follow-up surveys at 2 weeks and 1, 2, and 3 months posttreatment. All the study procedures were performed remotely and electronically. The primary outcome was pain catastrophizing 1-month posttreatment, with pain intensity, pain bothersomeness, and sleep disruption as secondary outcomes. We also report a more rigorous test of the durability of treatment effects at 3 months posttreatment. Data were collected from September 2020 to February 2021 and analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis. The analytic data set included participants (18/101, 17.8% clinic patients; 83/101, 82.1% community) who completed at least one study survey: ER (50/101, 49.5%) and WLC (51/104, 49%).

resultsParticipants (N=101) were 69.3% (70/101) female, with a mean age of 49.76 years (SD 13.90; range 24-78); 32.7% (33/101) had an undergraduate degree and self-reported chronic pain for 3 months. Participants reported high engagement (47/50, 94%), high satisfaction with ER (mean 8.26, SD 1.57; range 0-10), and high satisfaction with the Zoom platform (46/50, 92%). For the between-groups factor, ER was superior to WLC for all primary and secondary outcomes at 3 months posttreatment (highest P<.001), and between-groups Cohen d effect sizes ranged from 0.45 to 0.79, indicating that the superiority was of moderate to substantial clinical importance. At 3 months, clinically meaningful pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) reductions were found for ER but not for WLC (ER: PCS -8.72, 42.25% reduction; WLC: PCS -2.25, 11.13% reduction). ER resulted in significant improvements in pain intensity, sleep disturbance, and clinical improvements in pain bothersomeness.

conclusionsZoom-delivered ER had high participant satisfaction and very high engagement. Among adults with chronic pain, this single-session, Zoom-delivered, skills-based pain class resulted in clinically significant improvement across a range of pain-related outcomes that was sustained at 3 months. Web-based delivery of ER could allow greater accessibility of home-based pain treatment and could address the inconveniences and barriers faced by patients when attempting to receive in-person care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04546685; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546685.

Indexed as

Chronic PainCOVID-19AdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansPain ManagementPandemicsSARS-CoV-2chronic painempowered reliefpain catastrophizingpain intensityrandomized-controlled trialsingle-sessionZoom-delivered

Identifiers

PMID34505832
PMCPMC8463950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.