Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505715›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2022

Virtual neuromuscular ultrasound courses during COVID-19 pandemic: Leveraging technology to enhance learning opportunities.

Eman A Tawfik, Nens van Alfen, Michael S Cartwright, Peter Inkpen, Antonios Kerasnoudis, Doris Lieba-Samal, Natalie Winter, Francis O Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-learning Challenges among Healthcare Students: A Scoping Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eman A TawfikDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3964-5442
Nens van AlfenDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-8125
Michael S CartwrightDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Peter InkpenDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Antonios KerasnoudisDepartment of Neurology, St Luke's Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3135-4413
Doris Lieba-SamalNeurology Practice, Medical Center Gallneukirchen, Gallneukirchen, Austria.
Natalie WinterDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Francis O WalkerDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

aimsHands-on supervised training is essential for learning diagnostic ultrasound. Unfortunately, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to suspension of in-person training courses. As a result, many hands-on training courses were converted into virtual courses during the pandemic. Several reports regarding virtual ultrasound courses exist, but none has addressed virtual neuromuscular ultrasound courses, their design, or participants' views of this form of training. Therefore, the aims of this study were: (1) to determine the feasibility of conducting virtual neuromuscular ultrasound courses during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) to report the positive and negative aspects of the courses through the analyses of the responses of post-course surveys.

methodsTwo virtual neuromuscular ultrasound courses, basic and intermediate level, were conducted by the Egyptian Neuromuscular Ultrasound society during August 2020. Post-course, the attendees were directed to an electronic survey that consisted of eight questions. Ninety-three responses (23.8%) were obtained from the survey of the basic course and 156 responses (44.4%) were obtained from the survey of the intermediate course.

resultsNinety-eight percent of the respondents to basic course surveys, and 100% of the respondents to the intermediate course survey found the courses useful or very useful. DISCUSSION: This report demonstrates the utility of virtual neuromuscular ultrasound courses for those participants willing to respond to a survey and describes a proposed design for such courses. Although hands-on supervised ultrasound training is ideal, virtual courses can be useful alternatives to in-person training when in-person interaction is restricted.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceNeuromuscular DiseasesUltrasonographyHumansPandemicsTechnologyCOVID-19neuromuscular ultrasoundtrainingultrasound imagingvirtual course

Identifiers

PMID34505715
PMCPMC8662086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.