ReviewESC heart failure2021
The dominant left ventricular assist device: lessons from an era.
Review in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Oxidative Stress on Mitochondrial Damage and Repair in Heart Disease and Ischemic Events.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The dominant left ventricular assist device: lessons from an era.ESC heart failure · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production and distribution of the HeartWare ventricular assist device has come to an abrupt end, but with this end comes the opportunity to reflect upon lessons learned from its lifespan. Running counter to the standard of evidence-based practice, the era of the HeartWare ventricular assist device was marred with fragmented data in relation to its primary counterpart, the HeartMate III. This created an incomplete understanding of devices, limited individualized patient care, and effectively positioned providers to make inferences regarding device superiority. We briefly review pertinent literature on this topic among the most commonly implanted durable devices from the era, detail the inherent limitations of this data, and argue the necessity of randomized clinical trials among novel devices towards the optimization of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.