ArticleEndocrine2022
Core needle biopsy and ultrasonography are superior to fine needle aspiration in the management of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas.
Article in Endocrine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of an ultrasound-based radiomics model for central lymph node metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFollicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) is a problematic entity. FVPTCs are often misdiagnosed by the standard fine needle aspiration (FNA); in addition, FVPTCs represent a mixed group of tumors with two biologically distinct subtypes: The indolent encapsulated FVPTC and the aggressive infiltrative FVPTC. Recent changes in guidelines suggests that FVPTC management may be improved if subtypes can be determined preoperatively. Preoperative assays, FNA, core needle biopsy (CNB), and ultrasonography (US) were compared for their ability to identify and subtype FVPTCs to determine the most appropriate test to manage FVPTCs.
methodsThe preoperative assays and clinicopathologic variables of 255 resected FVPTCs cases at Samsung Medical Center between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated.
resultsCNB had the overall best ability to manage FVPTCs with the highest rate of diagnosis indicating surgery, lowest rate of inconclusive results, high sensitivity (88.9%), specificity (87.7%), negative predictive value (97.0%), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR; 56.9), and excellent predictive ability (AUC 0.906) for differentiating FVPTC subtypes. US had a moderate DOR (12.8), good predictive ability (AUC 0.802), high sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (81.0%). CNB and US both had significantly higher accuracy for discriminating FVPTC subtypes than FNA (AUC 0.908 and 0.877 > 0.671; p < 0.05). The excellent performance of CNB could be attributed to distinct histologic differences between FVPTC subtypes.
conclusionCNB and US had superior performance to FNA in the identification and subtyping of FVPTC. In institutions with skilled and experienced operators, CNB is the preferred method for evaluating possible FVPTC lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.