Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505229›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2021

Craniospinal irradiation as part of re-irradiation for children with recurrent medulloblastoma.

Lorena V Baroni, Candela Freytes, Nicolás Fernández Ponce, Agustina Oller, Natalia Pinto, Adriana Gonzalez, Francisco R Maldonado, Claudia Sampor, Carlos Rugilo, Fabiana Lubieniecki and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Role of Radiotherapy in Patients With Relapsed Medulloblastoma.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorena V BaroniService of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Combate de los Pozos 1881, C1245AAM, Buenos Aires, Argentina. lorelein@msn.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-7080
Candela FreytesService of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Combate de los Pozos 1881, C1245AAM, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nicolás Fernández PonceService of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Combate de los Pozos 1881, C1245AAM, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agustina OllerService of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Combate de los Pozos 1881, C1245AAM, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Natalia PintoService of Radiotherapy, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Adriana GonzalezService of Interdisciplinary Clinic, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Francisco R MaldonadoService of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Claudia SamporService of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Combate de los Pozos 1881, C1245AAM, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carlos RugiloService of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fabiana LubienieckiService of Pathology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel AldereteService of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Combate de los Pozos 1881, C1245AAM, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Danalder09@gmail.com.
Garrahan Hospital · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies have demonstrated in the last years that once medulloblastoma has recurred, the probability of regaining tumor control is poor despite salvage therapy. Although re-irradiation has an emerging role in other relapsed brain tumors, there is a lack of strong data on re-irradiation for medulloblastoma.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18 years or under, treated at least by a second course of external beam for recurrence medulloblastoma at Garrahan Hospital between 2009 and 2020. Twenty-four patients met eligibility criteria for inclusion. All patients received upfront radiotherapy as part of the curative-intent first radiotherapy, either craniospinal irradiation (CSI) followed by posterior fossa boost in 20 patients or focal posterior fossa radiation in 4 infants. The second course of radiation consisted of CSI in 15 and focal in 9. The 3-year post first failure OS (50% vs. 0%; p = 0.0010) was significantly better for children who received re-CSI compared to children who received focal re-irradiation. Similarly, the 3-year post-re-RT PFS (31% vs. 0%; p = 0.0005) and OS (25% vs. 0%; p = 0.0003) was significantly improved for patients who received re-CSI compared to patients who received focal re-irradiation. No symptomatic intratumoral haemorrhagic events or symptomatic radionecrosis were observed. Survivors fell within mild to moderate intellectual disability range, with a median IQ at last assessment of 58 (range 43-69).

conclusionsRe-irradiation with CSI is a safe and effective treatment for children with relapsed medulloblastoma; improves disease control and survival compared with focal re-irradiation. However this approach carries a high neurocognitive cost.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsCraniospinal IrradiationMedulloblastomaRe-IrradiationBrain NeoplasmsChildFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesMedulloblastomaRadiotherapyRe-irradiationRelapse

Identifiers

PMID34505229
OpenAlexW3197076383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.