Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505225›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021

Safety, environmental and technological characterization of beneficial autochthonous lactic bacteria, and their vaginal administration to pregnant cows for the design of homologous multi-strain probiotic formulas.

María Hortencia Miranda, Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco, María Elena Fátima Nader-Macías

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of biofilm and exopolysaccharide production in Bacillus strains isolated from the bovine uterus.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Hortencia MirandaCentro de Referencia Para Lactobacilos, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Chacabuco 145, 4000, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
Cecilia Aristimuño FicosecoCentro de Referencia Para Lactobacilos, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Chacabuco 145, 4000, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
María Elena Fátima Nader-MacíasCentro de Referencia Para Lactobacilos, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Chacabuco 145, 4000, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina. fnader@cerela.org.ar.
Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán · AR

Funding

ANPCyT PICT 4324 and 1187CONICET PIP 744 and 545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, veterinary probiotic formulations constitute an interesting alternative to the use of antibiotics in animals for human consumption, but beneficial microorganisms must meet certain requirements to be included in these products. The objective of this work was to evaluate the safety and innocuity of beneficial autochthonous lactic bacteria (BALB) as well as to determine their beneficial, environmental, and technological characterization. Antibiotic resistance was assayed using phenotypic and genotypic methodology. A bovine vaginal fluid simulated medium (MSBVF) was designed where growth, pH changes, and expression of beneficial characteristics of lactic bacteria were evaluated; additionally, the optimal culture conditions in commercial media were determined in order to obtain the highest biomass production of the strains. Finally, the best strains were lyophilized and administered intravaginally to pregnant cows and their permanence in the vagina and adverse effects were evaluated. The results show that most of the strains were resistant to vancomycin, tetracycline, and streptomycin, with a high sensitivity to ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin. The strains evaluated did not show gelatinase or hyaluronidase activity; however, 11 strains produced α-type hemolysis. The optimal growth of the microorganism was obtained in MRS broth, under slight agitation and without pH control. The strains grown in the MSBVF grew well and maintained the probiotic properties. Animals treated with probiotics bacteria did not show systemic or local inflammation. These strains can be included in a probiotic veterinary product to be applied to different bovine mucosa.

Indexed as

LactobacillalesProbioticsAdministration, IntravaginalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleCulture MediaFemalePregnancyVaginaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture MediaCattle characterizationEnvironmental-technological characterizationGrowth parametersLactic acid bacteriaPregnant cow administrationSafety properties

Identifiers

PMID34505225
PMCPMC8578494
OpenAlexW3198749155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.