Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505205›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Validation of the Italian version of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII).

Francesca Pasqualin, Carolina Barnett, Silvia Vittoria Guidoni, Elisa Albertini, Mario Ermani, Domenico Marco Bonifati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Clinical features of myasthenia gravis with thyroid eye disease: identifying critical gaps and next steps.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca PasqualinUnit of Neurology, Ospedale Regionale Ca' Foncello, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Carolina BarnettDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Silvia Vittoria GuidoniUnit of Neurology, Ospedale Regionale Ca' Foncello, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Elisa AlbertiniUnit of Neurology, Ospedale Regionale Ca' Foncello, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Mario ErmaniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Domenico Marco BonifatiUnit of Neurology, Ospedale Regionale Ca' Foncello, 31100, Treviso, Italy. domenicomarco.bonifati@aulss2.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7204-7228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate the Italian version of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII).

introductionMGII is a recent promising measure developed for MG patient evaluation. It includes a clinical severity evaluation and a patient-reported questionnaire. It has been developed in English and has demonstrated feasibility, reliability, and construct validity. Recently, its Dutch translation has been validated.

methodsMGII was translated to Italian with a multi-step forward process. We assessed correlations with the following scores: Istituto Nazionale Carlo Besta score for Myasthenia Gravis (INCB-MG), the MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), the Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC), the Quality of Life 15 for Myasthenia Gravis (QOL15-MG), and the Myasthenia Gravis Disability (MGDIS). We also assessed differences in MGII scores by disease severity with the ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test.

resultsOne hundred forty-one patients were enrolled. The mean MGII total score was 13.3 ± 11.9 (range 0-49), with a mean ocular subscore of 3.7 ± 4.7 and a mean MGII generalized subscore of 9.6 ± 9.0. As expected, the MGII had a good correlation with the other severity scores. The MGII had a lower floor effect (3.5%) than the other measures. Twenty-five patients were assessed in follow-up; as expected, the MGII change scores had moderate correlations with change in other MG severity measures and lower correlations with quality of life measures.

conclusionsThe MGII score was cross-culturally validated in an Italian cohort of MG patients. We confirmed its lower floor effect and the correlations with other MG measures including INCB-MG that was not evaluated in previous studies.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingMyasthenia GravisHumansQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesImpairment indexItalianMGIIMyasthenia gravisValidation

Identifiers

PMID34505205
PMCPMC8860822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.