ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2021
Joint Learning for Biomedical NER and Entity Normalization: Encoding Schemes, Counterfactual Examples, and Zero-Shot Evaluation.
Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-fidelity parameter-efficient fine-tuning for joint recognition and linking of diagnoses to ICD-10 in non-standard primary care notes.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2025Article
- Extracting Medical Information From Free-Text and Unstructured Patient-Generated Health Data Using Natural Language Processing Methods: Feasibility Study With Real-world Data.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Named entity recognition (NER) and normalization (EN) form an indispensable first step to many biomedical natural language processing applications. In biomedical information science, recognizing entities (e.g., genes, diseases, or drugs) and normalizing them to concepts in standard terminologies or thesauri (e.g., Entrez, ICD-10, or RxNorm) is crucial for identifying more informative relations among them that drive disease etiology, progression, and treatment. In this effort we pursue two high level strategies to improve biomedical ER and EN. The first is to decouple standard entity encoding tags (e.g., "B-Drug" for the beginning of a drug) into type tags (e.g., "Drug") and positional tags (e.g., "B"). A second strategy is to use additional counterfactual training examples to handle the issue of models learning spurious correlations between surrounding context and normalized concepts in training data. We conduct elaborate experiments using the MedMentions dataset, the largest dataset of its kind for ER and EN in biomedicine. We find that our first strategy performs better in entity normalization when compared with the standard coding scheme. The second data augmentation strategy uniformly improves performance in span detection, typing, and normalization. The gains from counterfactual examples are more prominent when evaluating in zero-shot settings, for concepts that have never been encountered during training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.