Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505115›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2021

Joint Learning for Biomedical NER and Entity Normalization: Encoding Schemes, Counterfactual Examples, and Zero-Shot Evaluation.

Jiho Noh, Ramakanth Kavuluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiho NohDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Ramakanth KavuluruDivision of Biomedical Informatics (Internal Medicine), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

Advanced End-to-End Relation Extraction with Deep Neural NetworksR01LM013240 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KAVULURU, VENKATA NAGA RAMAKANTH · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Named entity recognition (NER) and normalization (EN) form an indispensable first step to many biomedical natural language processing applications. In biomedical information science, recognizing entities (e.g., genes, diseases, or drugs) and normalizing them to concepts in standard terminologies or thesauri (e.g., Entrez, ICD-10, or RxNorm) is crucial for identifying more informative relations among them that drive disease etiology, progression, and treatment. In this effort we pursue two high level strategies to improve biomedical ER and EN. The first is to decouple standard entity encoding tags (e.g., "B-Drug" for the beginning of a drug) into type tags (e.g., "Drug") and positional tags (e.g., "B"). A second strategy is to use additional counterfactual training examples to handle the issue of models learning spurious correlations between surrounding context and normalized concepts in training data. We conduct elaborate experiments using the MedMentions dataset, the largest dataset of its kind for ER and EN in biomedicine. We find that our first strategy performs better in entity normalization when compared with the standard coding scheme. The second data augmentation strategy uniformly improves performance in span detection, typing, and normalization. The gains from counterfactual examples are more prominent when evaluating in zero-shot settings, for concepts that have never been encountered during training.

Indexed as

biomedical natural language processingdeep neural networksentity normalizationinformation extractionnamed entity recognition

Identifiers

PMID34505115
PMCPMC8425398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.