Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34504984›Full record

ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Evaluation of Existing QSAR Models and Structural Alerts and Development of New Ensemble Models for Genotoxicity Using a Newly Compiled Experimental Dataset.

Prachi Pradeep, Richard Judson, David M DeMarini, Nagalakshmi Keshava, Todd M Martin, Jeffry Dean, Catherine F Gibbons, Anita Simha, Sarah H Warren, Maureen R Gwinn and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development and application of consensusFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prachi PradeepOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Richard JudsonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
David M DeMariniCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Nagalakshmi KeshavaCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Todd M MartinCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Jeffry DeanCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Catherine F GibbonsCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Anita SimhaORAU, contractor to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the National Student Services Contract, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah H WarrenCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Maureen R GwinnCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Grace PatlewiczCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory agencies world-wide face the challenge of performing risk-based prioritization of thousands of substances in commerce. In this study, a major effort was undertaken to compile a large genotoxicity dataset (54,805 records for 9299 substances) from several public sources (e.g., TOXNET, COSMOS, eChemPortal). The names and outcomes of the different assays were harmonized, and assays were annotated by type: gene mutation in

Indexed as

AmesclastogenicitygenotoxicityQSARrisk-based prioritizationstructural alertTSCA

Identifiers

PMID34504984
PMCPMC8422876
OpenAlexW3141704164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.