Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34504580›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021

Genital self-mutilation: A challenging pathology (Review).

Sorin Lupu, Ovidiu Gabriel Bratu, Delia Mirela Tit, Simona Bungau, Octavian Maghiar, Teodor Andrei Maghiar, Camelia C Scarneciu, Ioan Scarneciu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sorin LupuClinic of Urology, Brasov Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Brasov 500326, Romania.
Ovidiu Gabriel BratuClinical Department 3, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Delia Mirela TitDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 3700 Oradea, Romania.
Simona BungauDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 3700 Oradea, Romania.
Octavian MaghiarDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 3700 Oradea, Romania.
Teodor Andrei MaghiarDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 3700 Oradea, Romania.
Camelia C ScarneciuDepartment of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine, 'Transilvania' University of Brasov, 500019 Brasov, Romania.
Ioan ScarneciuDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine, 'Transilvania' University of Brasov, 500019 Brasov, Romania.
University of Oradea · ROTransylvania University of Brașov · ROCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genital self-mutilation is a pathology that leads to numerous and important discussions, rarely presented in the medical literature. There have been many attempts to explain the reasons behind these medical phenomena, but single cases have been generally reported, making it extremely difficult to draw valid conclusions. It is acknowledged that there are psychotic and non-psychotic causes, from psychiatric problems and sexual identity disorders to cultural or religious reasons, alcohol or recreational drug consumption, unconventional types of sexual satisfaction or self-satisfaction. Recent theories consider self-mutilation as a phenomenon of reducing distress or tension, as an expression of feelings of anger or sorrow. It is believed that 55-85% of those who have resorted to self-mutilation have at least once in their life tried to commit suicide. There is evidence that early discovery and intervention as well as proper treatment in regards to psychosis can significantly reduce the number of self-mutilation episodes, with a protective role of these individuals. Cases of genital self-mutilation may be considered real medical emergencies, sometimes extremely challenging and accompanied by severe complications. Injury of the genital area is usually accompanied by numerous early or long-term complications due to the marked vascular area and to the microbial flora present in this part of the body. The degree of mutilation is an unforeseen aspect that the medical staff may have to encounter during the intervention, sometimes testing their imagination and surgical skills when dealing with such a case. Understanding the causes of these self-aggressive behaviors, which may be life-threatening, is critical and multidisciplinary mobilization is needed after treatment of the acute phases. The outcome of these patients depends on integrated collaborative work. These cases represent a serious reason for frustration for the physicians involved in solving them, and knowledge of these issues is valuable to urologists, psychiatrists and other health professionals.

Indexed as

auto-aggressive behaviorgenital self-mutilationmedical emergenciesnon-psychoticpsychoticrare cases

Identifiers

PMID34504580
PMCPMC8383337
OpenAlexW3187617658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.