ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Ocoxin oral solution demonstrates antiviral properties in cellular models.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocoxin Oral Solution (OOS) and Viusid (VS) are nutritional supplements that include several natural products which affect different cellular functions, such as proliferation or the redox status. In addition, some of their constituent components have been described to exert an antiviral effect. Considering this, it was hypothesized that treatment with OOS and VS could protect from viral infections. In order to evaluate the impact of OOS and VS on viral infection, lentivirus and retrovirus whose genomes coded for green fluorescent protein were used. In addition, and as a second approach to measure viral infection, a hemagglutinin-tagged form of the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK5 was also inserted in the retroviral vector. Viral particles produced in 293T cells were used to infect HeLa cells in the presence or absence of OOS or VS. It was observed that VS had a minimal effect on the capacity of either lentivirus or retrovirus to infect HeLa cells. However, OOS significantly reduced the infection of HeLa cells with both of these viruses. The effect was dose-dependent, reaching a maximum at a 1:100 dilution of OOS. These results suggested that, in addition to its well-known antitumoral properties, OOS may also inhibit infection with viruses. This effect is relevant since patients receiving oncological therapies are more susceptible to viral infections, and nutritional supplements such as OOS may help in reducing the severity of these potential pathogenic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.